Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] linux-user: Add "safe" parameter to do_guest_openat()

[Richard Henderson]

On 6/6/23 12:29, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > The only concrete objection I have is the change of API, which could
> > be fixed with return
> > get_errno(openat(...)).
>
> I believe both openat() and safe_openat() return -1 on error and set
> errno, or am I missing something?
Oops, no, bad memory on my part -- I thought safe_foo returned -errno.


r~