|
From: | Anthony Krowiak |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390x/ap: Wire up the device request notifier interface |
Date: | Fri, 2 Jun 2023 11:00:15 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 |
On 6/2/23 10:28 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Hello Tony, On 6/2/23 16:11, Tony Krowiak wrote:Let's wire up the device request notifier interface to handle device unplugrequests for AP. Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>Link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230530225544.280031-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com/--- hw/vfio/ap.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/vfio/ap.c b/hw/vfio/ap.c index e0dd561e85a3..6e21d1da5a70 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/ap.c +++ b/hw/vfio/ap.c @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ #include "hw/vfio/vfio-common.h" #include "hw/s390x/ap-device.h" #include "qemu/error-report.h" +#include "qemu/event_notifier.h" +#include "qemu/main-loop.h" #include "qemu/module.h" #include "qemu/option.h" #include "qemu/config-file.h" @@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ struct VFIOAPDevice { APDevice apdev; VFIODevice vdev; + EventNotifier req_notifier; }; OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(VFIOAPDevice, VFIO_AP_DEVICE)@@ -84,10 +87,110 @@ static VFIOGroup *vfio_ap_get_group(VFIOAPDevice *vapdev, Error **errp)return vfio_get_group(groupid, &address_space_memory, errp); } +static void vfio_ap_req_notifier_handler(void *opaque) +{ + VFIOAPDevice *vapdev = opaque; + Error *err = NULL; + + if (!event_notifier_test_and_clear(&vapdev->req_notifier)) { + return; + } + + qdev_unplug(DEVICE(vapdev), &err); + + if (err) { + warn_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vapdev->vdev.name); + } +} + +static void vfio_ap_register_irq_notifier(VFIOAPDevice *vapdev,+ unsigned int irq, Error **errp)+{ + int fd; + size_t argsz; + IOHandler *fd_read; + EventNotifier *notifier; + struct vfio_irq_info *irq_info; + VFIODevice *vdev = &vapdev->vdev; + + switch (irq) {Do you have plan for more interrupts ? If not, you could convert the 'switch' statement to a simple 'if' and remove the fd_read variable.
At this time there are no plans for further interrupts, but the switch does make it easy to add them:) On the other hand, I have no problem changing this to an 'if' statement. The fd_read variable is used below in the call to the qemu_set_fd_handler() function, so I can't get rid of it.
+ case VFIO_AP_REQ_IRQ_INDEX: + notifier = &vapdev->req_notifier; + fd_read = vfio_ap_req_notifier_handler; + break; + default: + error_setg(errp, "vfio: Unsupported device irq(%d)", irq); + return; + } + + if (vdev->num_irqs < irq + 1) {+ error_setg(errp, "vfio: IRQ %u not available (number of irqs %u)",+ irq, vdev->num_irqs); + return; + } + + argsz = sizeof(*irq_info); + irq_info = g_malloc0(argsz); + irq_info->index = irq; + irq_info->argsz = argsz; + + if (ioctl(vdev->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO, + irq_info) < 0 || irq_info->count < 1) { + error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "vfio: Error getting irq info"); + goto out_free_info; + } + + if (event_notifier_init(notifier, 0)) { + error_setg_errno(errp, errno,+ "vfio: Unable to init event notifier for irq (%d)",+ irq); + goto out_free_info; + } + + fd = event_notifier_get_fd(notifier); + qemu_set_fd_handler(fd, fd_read, NULL, vapdev); ++ if (vfio_set_irq_signaling(vdev, irq, 0, VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER, fd,+ errp)) { + qemu_set_fd_handler(fd, NULL, NULL, vapdev); + event_notifier_cleanup(notifier); + } + +out_free_info: + g_free(irq_info); + +} + +static void vfio_ap_unregister_irq_notifier(VFIOAPDevice *vapdev, + unsigned int irq) +{ + Error *err = NULL; + EventNotifier *notifier; + + switch (irq) { + case VFIO_AP_REQ_IRQ_INDEX: + notifier = &vapdev->req_notifier; + break; + default: + error_report("vfio: Unsupported device irq(%d)", irq); + return; + } + + if (vfio_set_irq_signaling(&vapdev->vdev, irq, 0, + VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER, -1, &err)) { + warn_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vapdev->vdev.name); + } + + qemu_set_fd_handler(event_notifier_get_fd(notifier), + NULL, NULL, vapdev); + event_notifier_cleanup(notifier); +} + static void vfio_ap_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) { int ret; char *mdevid; + Error *err = NULL; VFIOGroup *vfio_group; APDevice *apdev = AP_DEVICE(dev); VFIOAPDevice *vapdev = VFIO_AP_DEVICE(apdev);@@ -116,6 +219,15 @@ static void vfio_ap_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)goto out_get_dev_err; } + vfio_ap_register_irq_notifier(vapdev, VFIO_AP_REQ_IRQ_INDEX, &err); + if (err) { + /* + * Report this error, but do not make it a failing condition.+ * Lack of this IRQ in the host does not prevent normal operation.+ */ + error_report_err(err);May be issue a warning instead ?
Given the comment above - i.e., not a failing condition - it probably makes sense to make it a warning.
Thanks, C.+ } + return; out_get_dev_err: @@ -129,6 +241,7 @@ static void vfio_ap_unrealize(DeviceState *dev) VFIOAPDevice *vapdev = VFIO_AP_DEVICE(apdev); VFIOGroup *group = vapdev->vdev.group; + vfio_ap_unregister_irq_notifier(vapdev, VFIO_AP_REQ_IRQ_INDEX); vfio_ap_put_device(vapdev); vfio_put_group(group); }
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |