qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] linux-headers: Update with vfio_ap IRQ index mapping


From: Anthony Krowiak
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] linux-headers: Update with vfio_ap IRQ index mapping
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 08:52:54 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0



On 5/30/23 8:56 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 5/30/23 6:55 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
---
  linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

Worth nothing here that linux-headers patches should be generated using 
scripts/update-linux-headers.sh.

Since this linux-headers update includes changes that aren't merged into the 
kernel yet, I would still use update-linux-headers.sh -- but also include in 
the commit message that this is a placeholder patch that includes unmerged uapi 
changes.  Then once the kernel changes merge you can just have a proper 
linux-headers update patch in a subsequent qemu series.

I guess I do not understand the procedure here. I first determined the latest kernel release in which the vfio.h file was updated with the following command:
git log --oneline origin/master -- linux-headers/linux/vfio.h

According to the git log, the vfio.h file was last updated in kernel v6.3-rc5. I cloned that kernel from git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable and checked out kernel 6.3-rc5. I then made the changes to the linux-headers/linux/vfio.h file and ran the update-linux-headers.sh script and created this patch from that. Where did I go wrong?



diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/vfio.h b/linux-headers/linux/vfio.h
index 4a534edbdcba..2658fda219e8 100644
--- a/linux-headers/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/linux-headers/linux/vfio.h
@@ -646,6 +646,15 @@ enum {
        VFIO_CCW_NUM_IRQS
  };
+/*
+ * The vfio-ap bus driver makes use of the following IRQ index mapping.
+ * Unimplemented IRQ types return a count of zero.
+ */
+enum {
+       VFIO_AP_REQ_IRQ_INDEX,
+       VFIO_AP_NUM_IRQS
+};
+
  /**
   * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_PCI_HOT_RESET_INFO - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12,
   *                                          struct vfio_pci_hot_reset_info)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]