[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v20 14/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core
From: |
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v20 14/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core |
Date: |
Mon, 22 May 2023 21:38:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) |
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 18:14 +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:
> Introduction of the s390x cpu topology core functions and
> basic tests.
>
> We test the corelation between the command line and
> the QMP results in query-cpus-fast for various CPU topology.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> tests/avocado/s390_topology.py | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 209 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index fe5638e31d..41419840b0 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1662,6 +1662,7 @@ F: hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> F: target/s390x/kvm/cpu_topology.c
> F: docs/devel/s390-cpu-topology.rst
> F: docs/system/s390x/cpu-topology.rst
> +F: tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
>
> X86 Machines
> ------------
> diff --git a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..ce119a095e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
> +# Functional test that boots a Linux kernel and checks the console
> +#
> +# Copyright IBM Corp. 2023
> +#
> +# Author:
> +# Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> +#
> +# This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
> +# later. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> +
> +import os
> +import shutil
> +import time
> +
> +from avocado_qemu import QemuSystemTest
> +from avocado_qemu import exec_command
> +from avocado_qemu import exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern
> +from avocado_qemu import interrupt_interactive_console_until_pattern
> +from avocado_qemu import wait_for_console_pattern
> +from avocado.utils import process
> +from avocado.utils import archive
> +
> +
> +class LinuxKernelTest(QemuSystemTest):
I'd get rid of this class, unless you plan to use it for more children.
> + KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE = 'printk.time=0 '
> +
> + def wait_for_console_pattern(self, success_message, vm=None):
You always use the same args for this function, I'd refactor it into
def wait_until_booted(self):
> + wait_for_console_pattern(self, success_message,
> + failure_message='Kernel panic - not
> syncing',
> + vm=vm)
> +
> +
> +class S390CPUTopology(LinuxKernelTest):
> + """
> + S390x CPU topology consist of 4 topology layers, from bottom to top,
> + the cores, sockets, books and drawers and 2 modifiers attributes,
> + the entitlement and the dedication.
> + See: docs/system/s390x/cpu-topology.rst.
> +
> + S390x CPU topology is setup in different ways:
> + - implicitely from the '-smp' argument by completing each topology
> + level one after the other begining with drawer 0, book 0 and socket 0.
> + - explicitely from the '-device' argument on the QEMU command line
> + - explicitely by hotplug of a new CPU using QMP or HMP
> + - it is modified by using QMP 'set-cpu-topology'
> +
> + The S390x modifier attribute entitlement depends on the machine
> + polarization, which can be horizontal or vertical.
> + The polarization is changed on a request from the guest.
> + """
> + timeout = 90
> +
> +
> + def check_topology(self, c, s, b, d, e, t):
> + res = self.vm.qmp('query-cpus-fast')
> + line = res['return']
> + for x in line:
for cpu in cpus
> + core = x['props']['core-id']
> + socket = x['props']['socket-id']
> + book = x['props']['book-id']
> + drawer = x['props']['drawer-id']
> + entitlement = x['entitlement']
> + dedicated = x['dedicated']
> + if core == c:
> + self.assertEqual(drawer, d)
> + self.assertEqual(book, b)
> + self.assertEqual(socket, s)
> + self.assertEqual(entitlement, e)
> + self.assertEqual(dedicated, t)
> +
> + def kernel_init(self):
> + """
> + We need a kernel supporting the CPU topology.
> + We need a minimal root filesystem with a shell.
> + """
> + kernel_url = ('https://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive'
> + '/fedora-secondary/releases/35/Server/s390x/os'
> + '/images/kernel.img')
> + kernel_hash = '0d1aaaf303f07cf0160c8c48e56fe638'
> + kernel_path = self.fetch_asset(kernel_url, algorithm='md5',
> + asset_hash=kernel_hash)
> +
> + initrd_url = ('https://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive'
> + '/fedora-secondary/releases/35/Server/s390x/os'
> + '/images/initrd.img')
> + initrd_hash = 'a122057d95725ac030e2ec51df46e172'
> + initrd_path_xz = self.fetch_asset(initrd_url, algorithm='md5',
> + asset_hash=initrd_hash)
> + initrd_path = os.path.join(self.workdir, 'initrd-raw.img')
> + archive.lzma_uncompress(initrd_path_xz, initrd_path)
> +
> + self.vm.set_console()
> + kernel_command_line = (self.KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE +
> + 'root=/dev/ram '
> + 'selinux=0 '
> + 'rdinit=/bin/sh')
> + self.vm.add_args('-nographic',
> + '-enable-kvm',
> + '-cpu', 'z14,ctop=on',
> + '-m', '512',
> + '-name', 'Some Guest Name',
> + '-uuid', '30de4fd9-b4d5-409e-86a5-09b387f70bfa',
What is the meaning of those flags (name & uuid), do you need them?
Where does the value for the uuid come from?
> + '-kernel', kernel_path,
> + '-initrd', initrd_path,
> + '-append', kernel_command_line)
> +
> + def test_single(self):
Why no comment and avocado tags here?
> + self.kernel_init()
> + self.vm.launch()
> + self.wait_for_console_pattern('no job control')
> + self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> +
> + def test_default(self):
> + """
> + This test checks the implicite topology.
s/implicite/implicit/
> +
> + :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
> + :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio
> + """
> + self.kernel_init()
> + self.vm.add_args('-smp',
> + '13,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=3,cores=2,maxcpus=24')
> + self.vm.launch()
> + self.wait_for_console_pattern('no job control')
> + self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(1, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(2, 1, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(3, 1, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(4, 2, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(5, 2, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(6, 0, 1, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(7, 0, 1, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(8, 1, 1, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(9, 1, 1, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(10, 2, 1, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(11, 2, 1, 0, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(12, 0, 0, 1, 'medium', False)
> +
> + def test_move(self):
> + """
> + This test checks the topology modification by moving a CPU
> + to another socket: CPU 0 is moved from socket 0 to socket 2.
> +
> + :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
> + :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio
> + """
> + self.kernel_init()
> + self.vm.add_args('-smp',
> + '1,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=3,cores=2,maxcpus=24')
> + self.vm.launch()
> + self.wait_for_console_pattern('no job control')
> +
> + self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> + res = self.vm.qmp('set-cpu-topology',
> + {'core-id': 0, 'socket-id': 2, 'entitlement':
> 'low'})
> + self.assertEqual(res['return'], {})
> + self.check_topology(0, 2, 0, 0, 'low', False)
> +
> + def test_hotplug(self):
> + """
> + This test verifies that a CPU defined with '-device' command line
> + argument finds its right place inside the topology.
> +
> + :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
> + :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio
> + """
> + self.kernel_init()
> + self.vm.add_args('-smp',
> + '1,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=3,cores=2,maxcpus=24')
> + self.vm.add_args('-device', 'z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=10')
> + self.vm.launch()
> + self.wait_for_console_pattern('no job control')
> +
> + self.check_topology(10, 2, 1, 0, 'medium', False)
> +
> + def test_hotplug_full(self):
I would unite this test with the previous one.
Both test -device with some values missing.
> + """
> + This test verifies that a hotplugged fully defined with '-device'
> + command line argument finds its right place inside the topology.
> +
> + :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
> + :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio
> + """
> + self.kernel_init()
> + self.vm.add_args('-smp',
> + '1,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=3,cores=2,maxcpus=24')
> + self.vm.add_args('-device',
> + 'z14-s390x-cpu,'
> +
> 'core-id=1,socket-id=0,book-id=1,drawer-id=1,entitlement=low')
> + self.vm.add_args('-device',
> + 'z14-s390x-cpu,'
> +
> 'core-id=2,socket-id=0,book-id=1,drawer-id=1,entitlement=medium')
> + self.vm.add_args('-device',
> + 'z14-s390x-cpu,'
> +
> 'core-id=3,socket-id=1,book-id=1,drawer-id=1,entitlement=high')
> + self.vm.add_args('-device',
> + 'z14-s390x-cpu,'
> + 'core-id=4,socket-id=1,book-id=1,drawer-id=1')
> + self.vm.add_args('-device',
> + 'z14-s390x-cpu,'
> +
> 'core-id=5,socket-id=2,book-id=1,drawer-id=1,dedicated=true')
> + self.vm.launch()
> + self.wait_for_console_pattern('no job control')
> + self.check_topology(1, 0, 1, 1, 'low', False)
> + self.check_topology(2, 0, 1, 1, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(3, 1, 1, 1, 'high', False)
> + self.check_topology(4, 1, 1, 1, 'medium', False)
> + self.check_topology(5, 2, 1, 1, 'high', True)
Looks good all in all.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v20 14/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <=