|
| From: | Cédric Le Goater |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] migration: Don't use INT64_MAX for unlimited rate |
| Date: | Tue, 16 May 2023 14:47:38 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 |
On 5/16/23 11:24, Juan Quintela wrote:
David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com> wrote:Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> writes:Define and use RATE_LIMIT_MAX instead.Suggest "RATE_LIMIT_MAX_NONE".Then even better RATE_LIMIT_DISABLED?
I'd vote for RATE_LIMIT_DISABLED.
RATE_LIMIT_NONE? Using MAX and NONE at the same time looks strange.
Cheers, C.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |