[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC 5/7] migration: Remove unused threshold_size parameter
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC 5/7] migration: Remove unused threshold_size parameter |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:38:28 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.7 (2022-08-07) |
* Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> Until previous commit, save_live_pending() was used for ram. Now with
> the split into state_pending_estimate() and state_pending_exact() it
> is not needed anymore, so remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/migration/register.h | 7 +++----
> migration/savevm.h | 6 ++----
> hw/vfio/migration.c | 6 +++---
> migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 3 +--
> migration/block.c | 3 +--
> migration/migration.c | 4 ++--
> migration/ram.c | 6 ++----
> migration/savevm.c | 12 ++++--------
> 8 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/migration/register.h b/include/migration/register.h
> index 313b8e1c3b..5f08204fb2 100644
> --- a/include/migration/register.h
> +++ b/include/migration/register.h
> @@ -58,11 +58,10 @@ typedef struct SaveVMHandlers {
> * pending data.
> */
> /* This calculate the exact remaining data to transfer */
> - void (*state_pending_exact)(void *opaque, uint64_t threshold_size,
> - uint64_t *rest_precopy, uint64_t
> *rest_postcopy);
> + void (*state_pending_exact)(void *opaque, uint64_t *rest_precopy,
> + uint64_t *rest_postcopy);
> /* This estimates the remaining data to transfer */
> - void (*state_pending_estimate)(void *opaque, uint64_t threshold_size,
> - uint64_t *rest_precopy,
> + void (*state_pending_estimate)(void *opaque, uint64_t *rest_precopy,
> uint64_t *rest_postcopy);
>
> LoadStateHandler *load_state;
> diff --git a/migration/savevm.h b/migration/savevm.h
> index 613f85e717..24f2d2a28b 100644
> --- a/migration/savevm.h
> +++ b/migration/savevm.h
> @@ -40,11 +40,9 @@ void qemu_savevm_state_cleanup(void);
> void qemu_savevm_state_complete_postcopy(QEMUFile *f);
> int qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy(QEMUFile *f, bool iterable_only,
> bool inactivate_disks);
> -void qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact(uint64_t max_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy,
> +void qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact(uint64_t *res_precopy,
> uint64_t *res_postcopy);
> -void qemu_savevm_state_pending_estimate(uint64_t max_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy,
> +void qemu_savevm_state_pending_estimate(uint64_t *res_precopy,
> uint64_t *res_postcopy);
> void qemu_savevm_send_ping(QEMUFile *f, uint32_t value);
> void qemu_savevm_send_open_return_path(QEMUFile *f);
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/migration.c b/hw/vfio/migration.c
> index 680cf4df6e..d9598ce070 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/migration.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/migration.c
> @@ -456,8 +456,8 @@ static void vfio_save_cleanup(void *opaque)
> trace_vfio_save_cleanup(vbasedev->name);
> }
>
> -static void vfio_state_pending(void *opaque, uint64_t threshold_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy, uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> +static void vfio_state_pending(void *opaque, uint64_t *res_precopy,
> + uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> VFIODevice *vbasedev = opaque;
> VFIOMigration *migration = vbasedev->migration;
> @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static int vfio_save_iterate(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Reset pending_bytes as .save_live_pending is not called during savevm
> or
> + * Reset pending_bytes as .state_pending_* is not called during savevm or
That comment change feels like it lives in a different patch, other than
that:
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> * snapshot case, in such case vfio_update_pending() at the start of this
> * function updates pending_bytes.
> */
> diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
> index 5b24007650..8a11577252 100644
> --- a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
> +++ b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
> @@ -761,8 +761,7 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_save_complete(QEMUFile *f, void
> *opaque)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void dirty_bitmap_state_pending(void *opaque, uint64_t max_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy,
> +static void dirty_bitmap_state_pending(void *opaque, uint64_t *res_precopy,
> uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> DBMSaveState *s = &((DBMState *)opaque)->save;
> diff --git a/migration/block.c b/migration/block.c
> index 8e6ad1c468..4f1f7c0f8d 100644
> --- a/migration/block.c
> +++ b/migration/block.c
> @@ -862,8 +862,7 @@ static int block_save_complete(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void block_state_pending(void *opaque, uint64_t max_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy,
> +static void block_state_pending(void *opaque, uint64_t *res_precopy,
> uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> /* Estimate pending number of bytes to send */
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index 4676568699..97fefd579e 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -3737,12 +3737,12 @@ static MigIterateState
> migration_iteration_run(MigrationState *s)
> uint64_t pend_pre, pend_post;
> bool in_postcopy = s->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_POSTCOPY_ACTIVE;
>
> - qemu_savevm_state_pending_estimate(s->threshold_size, &pend_pre,
> &pend_post);
> + qemu_savevm_state_pending_estimate(&pend_pre, &pend_post);
> uint64_t pending_size = pend_pre + pend_post;
> trace_migrate_pending_estimate(pending_size, s->threshold_size,
> pend_pre, pend_post);
>
> if (pend_pre <= s->threshold_size) {
> - qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact(s->threshold_size, &pend_pre,
> &pend_post);
> + qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact(&pend_pre, &pend_post);
> pending_size = pend_pre + pend_post;
> trace_migrate_pending_exact(pending_size, s->threshold_size,
> pend_pre, pend_post);
> }
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 8d989d51db..53a5dd64a8 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -3434,8 +3434,7 @@ static int ram_save_complete(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void ram_state_pending_estimate(void *opaque, uint64_t max_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy,
> +static void ram_state_pending_estimate(void *opaque, uint64_t *res_precopy,
> uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> RAMState **temp = opaque;
> @@ -3451,8 +3450,7 @@ static void ram_state_pending_estimate(void *opaque,
> uint64_t max_size,
> }
> }
>
> -static void ram_state_pending_exact(void *opaque, uint64_t max_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy,
> +static void ram_state_pending_exact(void *opaque, uint64_t *res_precopy,
> uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> RAMState **temp = opaque;
> diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
> index 976ece3f3f..1e0328e088 100644
> --- a/migration/savevm.c
> +++ b/migration/savevm.c
> @@ -1471,8 +1471,7 @@ flush:
> * the result is split into the amount for units that can and
> * for units that can't do postcopy.
> */
> -void qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact(uint64_t threshold_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy,
> +void qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact(uint64_t *res_precopy,
> uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> SaveStateEntry *se;
> @@ -1489,13 +1488,11 @@ void qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact(uint64_t
> threshold_size,
> continue;
> }
> }
> - se->ops->state_pending_exact(se->opaque, threshold_size,
> - res_precopy, res_postcopy);
> + se->ops->state_pending_exact(se->opaque, res_precopy, res_postcopy);
> }
> }
>
> -void qemu_savevm_state_pending_estimate(uint64_t threshold_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy,
> +void qemu_savevm_state_pending_estimate(uint64_t *res_precopy,
> uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> SaveStateEntry *se;
> @@ -1512,8 +1509,7 @@ void qemu_savevm_state_pending_estimate(uint64_t
> threshold_size,
> continue;
> }
> }
> - se->ops->state_pending_estimate(se->opaque, threshold_size,
> - res_precopy, res_postcopy);
> + se->ops->state_pending_estimate(se->opaque, res_precopy,
> res_postcopy);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.2
>
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [RFC 5/7] migration: Remove unused threshold_size parameter,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=