[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 13/14] s390x: Add KVM PV dump interface
From: |
Steffen Eiden |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 13/14] s390x: Add KVM PV dump interface |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jul 2022 13:46:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 |
Hi Janosch,
looks good to me.
Have a look on my comments.
On 7/21/22 15:22, Janosch Frank wrote:
Let's add a few bits of code which hide the new KVM PV dump API from
us via new functions.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
hw/s390x/pv.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/hw/s390x/pv.h | 8 +++++++
2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/pv.c b/hw/s390x/pv.c
index a5af4ddf46..48591c387d 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/pv.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/pv.c
@@ -175,6 +175,57 @@ bool kvm_s390_pv_info_basic_valid(void)
return info_valid;
}
+static int s390_pv_dump_cmd(uint64_t subcmd, uint64_t uaddr, uint64_t gaddr,
+ uint64_t len)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_pv_dmp dmp = {
+ .subcmd = subcmd,
+ .buff_addr = uaddr,
+ .buff_len = len,
+ .gaddr = gaddr,
+ };
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = s390_pv_cmd(KVM_PV_DUMP, (void *)&dmp);
+ if (ret) {
+ error_report("KVM DUMP command %ld failed", subcmd);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int kvm_s390_dump_cpu(S390CPU *cpu, void *buff)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_pv_dmp dmp = {
+ .subcmd = KVM_PV_DUMP_CPU,
+ .buff_addr = (uint64_t)buff,
+ .gaddr = 0,
+ .buff_len = info_dump.dump_cpu_buffer_len,
+ };
+ struct kvm_pv_cmd pv = {
+ .cmd = KVM_PV_DUMP,
+ .data = (uint64_t)&dmp,
+ };
+
+ return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_S390_PV_CPU_COMMAND, &pv);
+}
+
+int kvm_s390_dump_init(void)
+{
+ return s390_pv_dump_cmd(KVM_PV_DUMP_INIT, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
+int kvm_s390_dump_mem(uint64_t gaddr, size_t len, void *dest)
+{
+ return s390_pv_dump_cmd(KVM_PV_DUMP_CONFIG_STATE, (uint64_t)dest,
+ gaddr, len);
+}
Wouldn't be kvm_s390_dump_mem_state() a more precise name?
Or kvm_s390_dump_mem_meta, as the corresponding section in the dump
has that name (pv_mem_meta)
The current name may lead to the conclusion that this function dumps the
guests memory, which it does not.
+
+int kvm_s390_dump_finish(void *buff)
+{
+ return s390_pv_dump_cmd(KVM_PV_DUMP_COMPLETE, (uint64_t)buff, 0,
+ info_dump.dump_config_finalize_len);
+}
IIRC this is the only place were you call "complete-dump"
"finish". In the next patch you call that function in
"get_data_complete()". This is the only reference to that function.
Why not simply call it kvm_s390_dump_complete() to reduce confusion?
+
#define TYPE_S390_PV_GUEST "s390-pv-guest"
OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(S390PVGuest, S390_PV_GUEST)
diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/pv.h b/include/hw/s390x/pv.h
index 6fa55bf70e..f37021e189 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/pv.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/pv.h
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ uint64_t kvm_s390_pv_dmp_get_size_cpu(void);
uint64_t kvm_s390_pv_dmp_get_size_mem(void);
uint64_t kvm_s390_pv_dmp_get_size_complete(void);
bool kvm_s390_pv_info_basic_valid(void);
+int kvm_s390_dump_init(void);
+int kvm_s390_dump_cpu(S390CPU *cpu, void *buff);
+int kvm_s390_dump_mem(uint64_t addr, size_t len, void *dest);
+int kvm_s390_dump_finish(void *buff);
#else /* CONFIG_KVM */
static inline bool s390_is_pv(void) { return false; }
static inline int s390_pv_query_info(void) { return 0; }
@@ -66,6 +70,10 @@ static inline uint64_t kvm_s390_pv_dmp_get_size_cpu(void) {
return 0; }
static inline uint64_t kvm_s390_pv_dmp_get_size_mem(void) { return 0; }
static inline uint64_t kvm_s390_pv_dmp_get_size_complete(void) { return 0; }
static inline bool kvm_s390_pv_info_basic_valid(void) { return false; }
+static inline int kvm_s390_dump_init(void) { return 0; }
+static inline int kvm_s390_dump_cpu(S390CPU *cpu, void *buff, size_t len) {
return 0; }
+static inline int kvm_s390_dump_mem(uint64_t addr, size_t len, void *dest) {
return 0; }
+static inline int kvm_s390_dump_finish(void *buff) { return 0; }
#endif /* CONFIG_KVM */
int s390_pv_kvm_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp);
- Re: [PATCH v3 08/14] dump/dump: Add section string table support, (continued)
- [PATCH v3 09/14] dump/dump: Add arch section support, Janosch Frank, 2022/07/21
- [PATCH v3 11/14] s390x: Add protected dump cap, Janosch Frank, 2022/07/21
- [PATCH v3 12/14] s390x: Introduce PV query interface, Janosch Frank, 2022/07/21
- [PATCH v3 10/14] linux header sync, Janosch Frank, 2022/07/21
- [PATCH v3 13/14] s390x: Add KVM PV dump interface, Janosch Frank, 2022/07/21
- Re: [PATCH v3 13/14] s390x: Add KVM PV dump interface,
Steffen Eiden <=
- [PATCH v3 14/14] s390x: pv: Add dump support, Janosch Frank, 2022/07/21