qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] s390x/tcg: Implement Vector-Enhancements Facility 2


From: David Miller
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] s390x/tcg: Implement Vector-Enhancements Facility 2
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 12:06:48 -0400

There was also the patch that had them as .insn in the other series of emails.

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:52 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 02.05.22 09:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 28/04/2022 11.46, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> Implement Vector-Enhancements Facility 2 for s390x
> >>
> >> resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/738
> >>
> >> implements:
> >>      VECTOR LOAD ELEMENTS REVERSED               (VLER)
> >>      VECTOR LOAD BYTE REVERSED ELEMENTS          (VLBR)
> >>      VECTOR LOAD BYTE REVERSED ELEMENT           (VLEBRH, VLEBRF, VLEBRG)
> >>      VECTOR LOAD BYTE REVERSED ELEMENT AND ZERO  (VLLEBRZ)
> >>      VECTOR LOAD BYTE REVERSED ELEMENT AND REPLICATE (VLBRREP)
> >>      VECTOR STORE ELEMENTS REVERSED              (VSTER)
> >>      VECTOR STORE BYTE REVERSED ELEMENTS         (VSTBR)
> >>      VECTOR STORE BYTE REVERSED ELEMENTS         (VSTEBRH, VSTEBRF, 
> >> VSTEBRG)
> >>      VECTOR SHIFT LEFT DOUBLE BY BIT             (VSLD)
> >>      VECTOR SHIFT RIGHT DOUBLE BY BIT            (VSRD)
> >>      VECTOR STRING SEARCH                        (VSTRS)
> >>
> >>      modifies:
> >>      VECTOR FP CONVERT FROM FIXED                (VCFPS)
> >>      VECTOR FP CONVERT FROM LOGICAL              (VCFPL)
> >>      VECTOR FP CONVERT TO FIXED                  (VCSFP)
> >>      VECTOR FP CONVERT TO LOGICAL                (VCLFP)
> >>      VECTOR SHIFT LEFT                           (VSL)
> >>      VECTOR SHIFT RIGHT ARITHMETIC               (VSRA)
> >>      VECTOR SHIFT RIGHT LOGICAL                  (VSRL)
> >
> > Thanks, queued to my s390x-next branch now:
> >
> >   https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/commits/s390x-next/
> >
> Thanks for fixing up. At this point I would have suggested to exclude
> the tests for now.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]