[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH v3 3/5] target/s390x: Fix cc_calc_sla_64() missing overflows
From: |
Ilya Leoshkevich |
Subject: |
[PATCH v3 3/5] target/s390x: Fix cc_calc_sla_64() missing overflows |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:17:49 +0100 |
An overflow occurs for SLAG when at least one shifted bit is not equal
to sign bit. Therefore, we need to check that `shift + 1` bits are
neither all 0s nor all 1s. The current code checks only `shift` bits,
missing some overflows.
Fixes: cbe24bfa91d2 ("target-s390: Convert SHIFT, ROTATE SINGLE")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
target/s390x/tcg/cc_helper.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/cc_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/cc_helper.c
index c2c96c3a3c..b6acffa3e8 100644
--- a/target/s390x/tcg/cc_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/tcg/cc_helper.c
@@ -297,7 +297,8 @@ static uint32_t cc_calc_sla_32(uint32_t src, int shift)
static uint32_t cc_calc_sla_64(uint64_t src, int shift)
{
- uint64_t mask = ((1ULL << shift) - 1ULL) << (64 - shift);
+ /* Do not use (1ULL << (shift + 1)): it triggers UB when shift is 63. */
+ uint64_t mask = ((((1ULL << shift) - 1) << 1) + 1) << (64 - (shift + 1));
uint64_t sign = 1ULL << 63;
uint64_t match;
int64_t r;
--
2.31.1