[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC v6 00/13] s390x cleanup
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC v6 00/13] s390x cleanup |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jul 2021 11:34:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.32.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) |
On Wed, Jun 30 2021, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29 2021, "Cho, Yu-Chen" <acho@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> this is the next version of a cleanup series for s390x.
>>
>
> (...)
>
>> Cho, Yu-Chen (13):
>> target/s390x: meson: add target_user_arch
>> hw/s390x: rename tod-qemu.c to tod-tcg.c
>> hw/s390x: only build tod-tcg from the CONFIG_TCG build
>> hw/s390x: tod: make explicit checks for accelerators when initializing
>> target/s390x: remove tcg-stub.c
>> target/s390x: start moving TCG-only code to tcg/
>> target/s390x: move sysemu-only code out to cpu-sysemu.c
>> target/s390x: split cpu-dump from helper.c
>> target/s390x: make helper.c sysemu-only
>> target/s390x: use kvm_enabled() to wrap call to kvm_s390_get_hpage_1m
>> target/s390x: remove kvm-stub.c
>> target/s390x: move kvm files into kvm/
>> target/s390x: split sysemu part of cpu models
>
> I think this generally looks fine.
>
> However, I'd like to have a second pair of eyes look at this, especially
> at the cpu models.
Just a short note from my side: I'm planning to send a pull request
(late) this week, so having a version that is ready to merge before that
would be nice :)
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [RFC v6 00/13] s390x cleanup,
Cornelia Huck <=