Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] linux-user/s390x: some signal fixes

[Laurent Vivier]

Le 06/05/2021 à 13:54, Cornelia Huck a écrit :
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:33:53 -0700
> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> Version 2 splits lazy do-it-all patch.
>> Patch 1 has an additional fix, so I dropped the r-b.
>>
>> r~
>>
>> Richard Henderson (15):
>>   linux-user/s390x: Fix sigframe types
>>   linux-user/s390x: Use uint16_t for signal retcode
>>   linux-user/s390x: Remove PSW_ADDR_AMODE
>>   linux-user/s390x: Remove restore_sigregs return value
>>   linux-user/s390x: Fix trace in restore_regs
>>   linux-user/s390x: Fix sigcontext sregs value
>>   linux-user/s390x: Use tswap_sigset in setup_rt_frame
>>   linux-user/s390x: Tidy save_sigregs
>>   linux-user/s390x: Clean up single-use gotos in signal.c
>>   linux-user/s390x: Set psw.mask properly for the signal handler
>>   linux-user/s390x: Add stub sigframe argument for last_break
>>   linux-user/s390x: Fix frame_addr corruption in setup_frame
>>   linux-user/s390x: Add build asserts for sigset sizes
>>   linux-user/s390x: Clean up signal.c
>>   linux-user/s390x: Handle vector regs in signal stack
>>
>>  linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 280 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 file changed, 170 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> I assume the route-to-upstream for this is through the linux-user tree
> and not the s390x tree, right?
> 

Yes, and I'll try to do a PR soon.

Thanks,
Laurent