[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bi
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:21:10 +0100 |
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:49:22 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Am 09.03.2021 um 22:05 schrieb Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>:
> >
> > On 04/03/2021 09.10, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>> On 03.03.21 22:36, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >>> On 3/3/21 1:22 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am 03.03.2021 um 22:19 schrieb Richard Henderson
> >>>>> <richard.henderson@linaro.org>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 3/3/21 1:11 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>>>>> MMIO on s390x? :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c, memory_region_init_io*().
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ... part of system address space where a CPU could stumble over it?
> >>>
> >>> Impossible to tell within 3 layers of object wrappers. :-(
> >>> I suppose I have no idea how "pci" was hacked onto s390x.
> >> You've used the right words to describe "pci" (!) on s390x.
> >> IIRC, there is no MMIO: configuration space accesses etc. are performed
> >> using special access instructions - which will "emulate" the MMIO access
> >> performed on other archs via simple read/write instructions.
> >> Ordinary instructions (e.g., mvpg) that operate on the system address
> >> space should never stumble over MMIO regions - because that concept does
> >> not exist on s390x.
> >
> > Sorry, guys, you've lost me here ... is there now something left to do for
> > this patch or is it good as it is?
>
> I think that check for invalid TLB should be replaced by a check against host
> == NULL.
>
Just a reminder that softfreeze is on Tuesday next week, and I'd like
to send a pull request by Monday. So a v5 should arrive soon to make it
:)
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, David Hildenbrand, 2021/03/03
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, Richard Henderson, 2021/03/03
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, David Hildenbrand, 2021/03/03
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, Richard Henderson, 2021/03/03
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, David Hildenbrand, 2021/03/03
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, Richard Henderson, 2021/03/03
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, David Hildenbrand, 2021/03/04
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, Cornelia Huck, 2021/03/04
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, Thomas Huth, 2021/03/09
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, David Hildenbrand, 2021/03/10
- Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit,
Cornelia Huck <=
Re: [PATCH v4] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit, David Hildenbrand, 2021/03/11