[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option
From: |
Christian Borntraeger |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:24:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 |
On 14.01.21 10:19, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 14.01.21 10:10, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14.01.21 00:58, David Gibson wrote:
>> [...]
>>> +int s390_pv_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(cgs), TYPE_S390_PV_GUEST)) {
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_UNPACK)) {
>>> + error_setg(errp,
>>> + "CPU model does not support Protected Virtualization");
>>> + return -1;
>>> + }
>>
>> I am triggering this and I guess this is because the cpu model is not yet
>> initialized at
>> this point in time.
>>
> When I remove the check, things seems to work though ( I can access
> virtio-blk devices without
> specifying iommu for example)
Maybe we can turn things around and check in apply_cpu_model if the object
exists but
unpack was not specified?
Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option, Cornelia Huck, 2021/01/15