[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities f
From: |
Christian Borntraeger |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:28:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 |
On 11.12.20 11:51, Janosch Frank wrote:
> There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not
> advertise it and its support facilities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
shall we add
Fixes: 0f73c5b30b8b ("s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation")
or
Fixes: c3347ed0d2ee ("s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility")
?
> ---
> v2: added hpma2
> ---
> target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
> index 42fe0bf4ca..5528acd082 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
> @@ -107,8 +107,45 @@ void s390_fill_feat_block(const S390FeatBitmap features,
> S390FeatType type,
> feat = find_next_bit(features, S390_FEAT_MAX, feat + 1);
> }
>
> - if (type == S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC134 && s390_is_pv()) {
> + if (!s390_is_pv()) {
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Some facilities are not available for CPUs in protected mode:
> + * - All SIE facilities because SIE is not available
> + * - DIAG318
> + *
> + * As VMs can move in and out of protected mode the CPU model
> + * doesn't protect us from that problem because it is only
> + * validated at the start of the VM.
> + */
> + switch (type) {
> + case S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CPU:
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_F2)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_SKEY)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_GPERE)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_SIIF)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_SIGPIF)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_IB)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_CEI)->bit, data);
> + break;
> + case S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CONF_CHAR:
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_GSLS)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_HPMA2)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_KSS)->bit, data);
> + break;
> + case S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CONF_CHAR_EXT:
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_64BSCAO)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_CMMA)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_PFMFI)->bit, data);
> + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIE_IBS)->bit, data);
> + break;
> + case S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC134:
> clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_DIAG_318)->bit, data);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return;
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> index b5abff8bef..93d8744d29 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> @@ -239,8 +239,29 @@ bool s390_has_feat(S390Feat feat)
> }
> return 0;
> }
> - if (feat == S390_FEAT_DIAG_318 && s390_is_pv()) {
> - return false;
> +
> + if (s390_is_pv()) {
> + switch (feat) {
> + case S390_FEAT_DIAG_318:
> + case S390_FEAT_HPMA2:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_F2:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_SKEY:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_GPERE:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_SIIF:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_SIGPIF:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_IB:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_CEI:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_KSS:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_GSLS:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_64BSCAO:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_CMMA:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_PFMFI:
> + case S390_FEAT_SIE_IBS:
> + return false;
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> }
> return test_bit(feat, cpu->model->features);
> }
>