On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 12:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
Fix an endianness issue reported by Cornelia:
s390x tcg guest on x86, virtio-pci devices are not detected. The
relevant feature bits are visible to the guest. Same breakage with
different guest kernels.
KVM guests and s390x tcg guests on s390x are fine.
Fixes: 28dc86a0729 ("s390x/pci: use a PCI Group structure")
Reported-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
RFC because review-only patch, untested
---
hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
index 58cd041d17f..cfb54b4d8ec 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ int clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
ClpReqQueryPciGrp *reqgrp = (ClpReqQueryPciGrp *)reqh;
S390PCIGroup *group;
- group = s390_group_find(reqgrp->g);
+ group = s390_group_find(ldl_p(&reqgrp->g));
'g' in the ClpReqQueryPciGrp struct is a uint32_t, so
adding the ldl_p() will have no effect unless (a) the
structure is not 4-aligned and (b) the host will fault on
unaligned accesses, which isn't the case for x86 hosts.
Q: is this struct really in host order, or should we
be using ldl_le_p() or ldl_be_p() and friends here and
elsewhere?
thanks
-- PMM