Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

[Claudio Imbrenda]

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:18:55 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:13:49 -0400
> Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Collin Walling wrote:  
> > > On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > >     
> > >>>    
> > >>
> > >> Thanks, applied.
> > >>
> > >>    
> > > 
> > > Thanks Conny.
> > > 
> > > Much appreciated for everyone's patience and review. The only
> > > thing I'd like to hold out on for now is for someone to take a
> > > peek at patch #3 with respect to the protected virtualization
> > > stuff. I don't know too much about it, honestly, and I want to
> > > ensure that dynamically allocating memory for the SCCB makes
> > > sense there. The alternative would be to allocate a static 4K for
> > > the work_sccb. 
> > 
> > I had someone take a look at the patch for PV and was told
> > everything looks sane. Since the patches have already been applied,
> > it seems like it's too late to add a reviewed-by from someone?  
> 
> Have the reviewer reply with their R-b, and I'll happily add it, as I
> rebase s390-next before doing a pull req anyway :)

well it was me :)

you can add a 

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

for the first 6 patches, and an

Acked-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

for the last one


thanks!