[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add stsi 3.2.2 tests
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add stsi 3.2.2 tests |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:24:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 |
On 31.03.20 09:14, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Subcode 3.2.2 is handled by KVM/QEMU and should therefore be tested
> a bit more thorough.
>
> In this test we set a custom name and uuid through the QEMU command
> line. Both parameters will be passed to the guest on a stsi subcode
> 3.2.2 call and will then be checked.
>
> We also compare the configured cpu numbers against the smp reported
> numbers and if the reserved + configured add up to the total number
> reported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> ---
>
> * Tabify on struct
> * Moved prefix_push up a bit
> * Replaced returns with goto out to pop prefix
>
> ---
> s390x/stsi.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> s390x/unittests.cfg | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/s390x/stsi.c b/s390x/stsi.c
> index e9206bca137d2edb..17ad33eefb9c948a 100644
> --- a/s390x/stsi.c
> +++ b/s390x/stsi.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,28 @@
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> #include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <smp.h>
>
> +struct stsi_322 {
> + uint8_t reserved[31];
> + uint8_t count;
> + struct {
> + uint8_t reserved2[4];
> + uint16_t total_cpus;
> + uint16_t conf_cpus;
> + uint16_t standby_cpus;
> + uint16_t reserved_cpus;
> + uint8_t name[8];
> + uint32_t caf;
> + uint8_t cpi[16];
> + uint8_t reserved5[3];
> + uint8_t ext_name_encoding;
> + uint32_t reserved3;
> + uint8_t uuid[16];
> + } vm[8];
> + uint8_t reserved4[1504];
> + uint8_t ext_names[8][256];
Sorry, still no proper use of tabs. (can fixup if you agree)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb