[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] vfio-ccw: Return IOINST_CC_NOT_OPERATIONAL for EI
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] vfio-ccw: Return IOINST_CC_NOT_OPERATIONAL for EIO |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:04:30 +0100 |
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 22:45:03 +0100
Eric Farman <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Farhan Ali <address@hidden>
>
> EIO is returned by vfio-ccw mediated device when the backing
> host subchannel is not operational anymore. So return cc=3
> back to the guest, rather than returning a unit check.
> This way the guest can take appropriate action such as
> issue an 'stsch'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <address@hidden>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v1->v2: [EF]
> - Add s-o-b
> - [Seems the discussion on v1 centered on the return code
> set in the kernel, rather than anything that needs to
> change here, unless I've missed something.]
I've stared at this and at the kernel code for some time again; and I'm
not sure if "return -EIO == not operational" is even true. That said,
I'm not sure a unit check is the right response, either. The only thing
I'm sure about is that the kernel code needs some review of return
codes and some documentation...
>
> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> index 50cc2ec75c..19144ecfc7 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ again:
> return IOINST_CC_BUSY;
> case -ENODEV:
> case -EACCES:
> + case -EIO:
> return IOINST_CC_NOT_OPERATIONAL;
> case -EFAULT:
> default:
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] vfio-ccw: Return IOINST_CC_NOT_OPERATIONAL for EIO,
Cornelia Huck <=