[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v8 02/15] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v8 02/15] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:26:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 |
On 10.03.20 14:39, Janosch Frank wrote:
> The unpack facility provides the means to setup a protected guest. A
> protected guest can not be introspected by the hypervisor or any
"cannot"
> user/administrator of the machine it is running on.
>
> Protected guests are encrypted at rest and need a special boot
> mechanism via diag308 subcode 8 and 10.
>
> Code 8 sets the PV specific IPLB which is retained seperately from
"separately"
> those set via code 5.
>
> Code 10 is used to unpack the VM into protected memory, verify its
> integrity and start it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> Co-developed-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden> [Changes
> to machine]
[...]
> +static inline bool ipl_valid_pv_components(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
> +{
> + IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &iplb->pv;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (ipib_pv->num_comp == 0) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ipib_pv->num_comp; i++) {
> + /* Addr must be 4k aligned */
> + if (ipib_pv->components[i].addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) {
I usually find
QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(ipib_pv->components[i].addr, TARGET_PAGE_MASK)
nicer
[...]
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/pv.c b/hw/s390x/pv.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..1ba8bc7242
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/s390x/pv.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
> +/*
> + * Protected Virtualization functions
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2020
> + * Author(s):
> + * Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
> + * directory.
> + */
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> +
> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
> +#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> +#include "pv.h"
> +
> +const char *cmd_names[] = {
> + "VM_ENABLE",
> + "VM_DISABLE",
> + "VM_SET_SEC_PARAMS",
> + "VM_UNPACK",
> + "VM_VERIFY",
> + "VM_PREP_RESET",
> + "VM_UNSHARE_ALL",
> +};
> +
> +static int s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, void *data)
> +{
> + int rc;
reverse x... :)
> + struct kvm_pv_cmd pv_cmd = {
> + .cmd = cmd,
> + .data = (uint64_t)data,
> + };
> +
and then maybe
int rc = ...
> + rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_S390_PV_COMMAND, &pv_cmd);
> + if (rc) {
> + error_report("KVM PV command %d (%s) failed: header rc %x rrc %x "
> + "IOCTL rc: %d", cmd, cmd_names[cmd], pv_cmd.rc,
> pv_cmd.rrc,
> + rc);
> + }
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static void s390_pv_cmd_exit(uint32_t cmd, void *data)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = s390_pv_cmd(cmd, data);
int rc = ...
> + if (rc) {
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +}
> +
[...]
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index 895498cca6..455ad31718 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
> #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
> #include "hw/s390x/tod.h"
> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
>
> S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
> {
> @@ -316,10 +318,80 @@ static inline void s390_do_cpu_ipl(CPUState *cs,
> run_on_cpu_data arg)
> s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
> }
>
> +static void s390_machine_unprotect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
> +{
> +
superfluous empty line
> + s390_pv_vm_disable();
> + ms->pv = false;
> +}
> +
[...]
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> index 3dd396e870..bcb9e47767 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
> #include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
> #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
> #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
Do you need that include here? I don't think so.
> #include "hw/boards.h"
> #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> @@ -174,6 +176,27 @@ static void s390_cpu_disas_set_info(CPUState *cpu,
> disassemble_info *info)
> info->print_insn = print_insn_s390;
> }
>
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> +bool s390_is_pv(void)
> +{
> + static S390CcwMachineState *ccw;
> + Object *obj;
> +
> + if (ccw) {
> + return ccw->pv;
> + }
> +
> + /* we have to bail out for the "none" machine */
> + obj = object_dynamic_cast(qdev_get_machine(),
> + TYPE_S390_CCW_MACHINE);
> + if (!obj) {
> + return false;
> + }
> + ccw = S390_CCW_MACHINE(obj);
> + return ccw->pv;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
Nit: I *think* this would be better placed in hw/s390x/pv.h
> static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> {
> CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> index 1d17709d6e..8fa25d9ed5 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> @@ -762,6 +762,7 @@ static inline void s390_do_cpu_load_normal(CPUState *cs,
> run_on_cpu_data arg)
>
>
> /* cpu.c */
> +bool s390_is_pv(void);
Wonder if this will compile with CONFIG_USER_ONLY (maybe we need a
"return false" dummy). I assume you test-compiled that with all variants
(CONFIG_TCG, CONFIG_USER_ONLY, ...)
.. we're almost there ... :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
- Re: [PATCH v8 10/15] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDA, (continued)
- [PATCH v8 09/15] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10
- [PATCH v8 05/15] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10
- [PATCH v8 14/15] docs: Add protvirt docs, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10
- [PATCH v8 15/15] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10
- [PATCH v8 06/15] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10
- [PATCH v8 01/15] Sync pv, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10
- [PATCH v8 02/15] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10
- [PATCH v8 07/15] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10
- [PATCH v8 11/15] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10
- [PATCH v8 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/10