[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 13/17] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 13/17] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:00:52 +0100 |
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:16:32 -0500
Janosch Frank <address@hidden> wrote:
> For protected guests the IPIB is written/read to/from the satellite
> block, so we need to make those accesses virtual to make them go
> through KVM mem ops.
Confused. What does 'make those accesses virtual' mean?
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> ---
> target/s390x/diag.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
> index 6aaeef6029..59ae122e82 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t
> r1, uint64_t addr,
> void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t
> ra)
> {
> CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
> + S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
> uint64_t addr = env->regs[r1];
> uint64_t subcode = env->regs[r3];
> IplParameterBlock *iplb;
> @@ -118,14 +119,24 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1,
> uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
> if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, false)) {
> return;
> }
> +
Whitespace.
> iplb = g_new0(IplParameterBlock, 1);
> - cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
> + if (!env->pv) {
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
> + } else {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
> + }
> +
> if (!iplb_valid_len(iplb)) {
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
> goto out;
> }
>
> - cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + if (!env->pv) {
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + } else {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + }
>
> if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
> !(iplb_valid_pv(iplb) && s390_ipl_pv_check_components(iplb) >=
> 0)) {
> @@ -137,23 +148,30 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1,
> uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
> out:
> g_free(iplb);
> - return;
> + break;
> case DIAG308_STORE:
> case DIAG308_PV_STORE:
> if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, true)) {
> return;
> }
> +
Whitespace.
> if (subcode == DIAG308_PV_STORE) {
> iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
> } else {
> iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
> }
> - if (iplb) {
> - cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> - env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
> - } else {
> + if (!iplb) {
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF;
> + return;
> }
> +
> + if (!env->pv) {
> + cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + } else {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, 0, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + }
> +
> + env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
> break;
> case DIAG308_PV_START:
> iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/17] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker, (continued)
[PATCH v3 09/17] s390: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD, Janosch Frank, 2020/02/14
[PATCH v3 10/17] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops, Janosch Frank, 2020/02/14
[PATCH v3 12/17] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW, Janosch Frank, 2020/02/14
[PATCH v3 14/17] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation, Janosch Frank, 2020/02/14
[PATCH v3 15/17] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA, Janosch Frank, 2020/02/14
[PATCH v3 13/17] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD, Janosch Frank, 2020/02/14
- Re: [PATCH v3 13/17] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD,
Cornelia Huck <=
[PATCH v3 17/17] s390x: For now add unpack feature to GA1, Janosch Frank, 2020/02/14
[PATCH v3 11/17] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation, Janosch Frank, 2020/02/14
[PATCH v3 16/17] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly, Janosch Frank, 2020/02/14
Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] s390x: Protected Virtualization support, no-reply, 2020/02/14
Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] s390x: Protected Virtualization support, Cornelia Huck, 2020/02/18