[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390x: Increase architectural compliance
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390x: Increase architectural compliance |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:57:29 +0100 |
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:20:22 -0500
Janosch Frank <address@hidden> wrote:
> On a diag 308 subcode 0 and 1 we need to load the whole reset PSW and
> not just the address.
>
> On a cpu reset normal, we need to clear local cpus. Unfortunately we
> need a new API for that, since KVM only exposes one of the three
> resets.
>
> Patches are also in my cleanup branch.
>
> Janosch Frank (3):
> s390x: Properly fetch and test the short psw on diag308 subc 0/1
> Sync reset
> s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions
>
> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 7 +++++++
> target/s390x/cpu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> target/s390x/cpu.h | 1 +
> target/s390x/kvm-stub.c | 10 +++++++++-
> target/s390x/kvm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h | 4 +++-
> 6 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Ok, it seems I should just go ahead and pick patch 1, and defer the
remainder until after we agree on the interface, right?
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390x: Increase architectural compliance,
Cornelia Huck <=