[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset
From: |
Janosch Frank |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:22:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 |
On 11/22/19 1:10 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:47:44 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 22.11.19 12:46, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> On 11/22/19 11:59 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 22.11.19 08:52, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>>>> * Add comments that tell you which diag308 subcode caused the reset
>>>>> * Sort by diag308 reset subcode
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>>>>> index c1d1440272..88f7758721 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>>>>> @@ -330,15 +330,7 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>>>>> s390_cmma_reset();
>>>>>
>>>>> switch (reset_type) {
>>>>> - case S390_RESET_EXTERNAL:
>>>>> - case S390_RESET_REIPL:
>>>>> - qemu_devices_reset();
>>>>> - s390_crypto_reset();
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /* configure and start the ipl CPU only */
>>>>> - run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_ipl, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>>>>> - break;
>>>>> - case S390_RESET_MODIFIED_CLEAR:
>>>>> + case S390_RESET_MODIFIED_CLEAR: /* Subcode 0 */
>>>>
>>>> IMHO "Subcode X" isn't of much help here. We're out of diag handling.
>>>>
>>>> I'd suggest to just document the subcodes along with the definitions, if
>>>> really needed, and drop this patch, at least I don't quite see the value
>>>> of moving code around here... or is the code shuffling of any value on
>>>> your prot virt patches?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It keeps me from consulting the POP every time I need to change things
>>> in the machine resets. This is basically a 1:1 mapping of diag 308
>>> subcodes to machine resets, so why don't we want to make that obvious
>>> and order them by the subcodes?
>>>
>>
>> Because it is not a 1:1 mapping: S390_RESET_EXTERNAL
>>
>
> Tack the explanation onto the definitions of S390_RESET_, then?
> Probably still quicker than consulting the POP :)
>
Does it really bother you that much, that I add some explanations to the
things we're doing. The external reset also gets a comment so Conni
won't need that much coffee anymore to understand the code :-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] s390x: Cleanup cpu resets, (continued)
[PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/22
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/22
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/22
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/22
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset, Cornelia Huck, 2019/11/22
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset,
Janosch Frank <=
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/22
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/22
Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390x: Beautify machine reset, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/22
[PATCH 3/4] s390x: Beautify diag308 handling, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/22
Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390x: Reset cleanup, no-reply, 2019/11/22