[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:36:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 |
On 20/11/2019 12.43, Janosch Frank wrote:
> For diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 we have a new ipib of type 5. The ipib
> holds the address and length of the secure execution header, as well
> as a list of guest components.
>
> Each component is a block of memory, for example kernel or initrd,
> which needs to be decrypted by the Ultravisor in order to run a
> protected VM. The secure execution header instructs the Ultravisor on
> how to handle the protected VM and its components.
>
> Subcodes 8 and 9 are similiar to 5 and 6 and subcode 10 will finally
> start the protected guest.
>
> Subcodes 8-10 are not valid in protected mode, we have to do a subcode
> 3 and then the 8 and 10 combination for a protected reboot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.h b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> index d4813105db..7b8a493509 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,24 @@
> #include "cpu.h"
> #include "hw/qdev-core.h"
>
> +struct IPLBlockPVComp {
> + uint64_t tweak_pref;
> + uint64_t addr;
> + uint64_t size;
> +} QEMU_PACKED;
> +typedef struct IPLBlockPVComp IPLBlockPVComp;
> +
> +struct IPLBlockPV {
> + uint8_t reserved[84];
> + uint8_t reserved67[3];
What does the "67" mean here?
> + uint8_t version;
> + uint32_t num_comp;
> + uint64_t pv_header_addr;
> + uint64_t pv_header_len;
> + struct IPLBlockPVComp components[];
> +} QEMU_PACKED;
> +typedef struct IPLBlockPV IPLBlockPV;
Given the fact that we had quite some headaches with QEMU_PACKED structs
in the past already, and the structs seem to be naturally aligned ...
what about dropping the QEMU_PACKED here and using QEMU_BUILD_BUG() to
assert that the struct has the correct size?
[...]
> @@ -185,4 +211,11 @@ static inline bool iplb_valid_fcp(IplParameterBlock
> *iplb)
> iplb->pbt == S390_IPL_TYPE_FCP;
> }
>
> +static inline bool iplb_valid_se(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
> +{
> + return be32_to_cpu(iplb->len) >= S390_IPLB_MIN_PV_LEN &&
> + iplb->pbt == S390_IPL_TYPE_PV;
> +}
> +
> +
Drop one empty line?
> #endif
> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
> index 067c667ba7..32049bb4ee 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1,
> uint64_t r3)
> #define DIAG_308_RC_OK 0x0001
> #define DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF 0x0102
> #define DIAG_308_RC_INVALID 0x0402
> +#define DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF 0x0a02
> +#define DIAG_308_RC_INV_FOR_PV 0x0b02
>
> #define DIAG308_RES_MOD_CLR 0
> #define DIAG308_RES_LOAD_NORM 1
> @@ -59,6 +61,9 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1,
> uint64_t r3)
> #define DIAG308_LOAD_NORMAL_DUMP 4
> #define DIAG308_SET 5
> #define DIAG308_STORE 6
> +#define DIAG308_PV_SET 8
> +#define DIAG308_PV_STORE 9
> +#define DIAG308_PV_START 10
>
> static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr,
> uintptr_t ra, bool write)
> @@ -105,6 +110,7 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1,
> uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
> s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_REIPL);
> break;
> case DIAG308_SET:
> + case DIAG308_PV_SET: /* Set SE parms */
> if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, false)) {
> return;
> }
> @@ -117,7 +123,8 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1,
> uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>
> cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>
> - if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb)) {
> + if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
> + !(iplb_valid_se(iplb) && s390_ipl_pv_check_comp(iplb) >= 0)) {
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -128,10 +135,15 @@ out:
> g_free(iplb);
> return;
> case DIAG308_STORE:
> + case DIAG308_PV_STORE: /* Get SE parms */
> if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, true)) {
> return;
> }
> - iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
> + if (subcode == DIAG308_PV_STORE) {
> + iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
> + } else {
> + iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
> + }
> if (iplb) {
> cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
> @@ -139,6 +151,16 @@ out:
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF;
> }
> return;
> + break;
<hamletmode>
To return or to break, that's the question...
</hamletmode>
... please choose one of the two.
> + case DIAG308_PV_START: /* SE start */
> + iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
> + if (!iplb_valid_se(iplb)) {
> + env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_PV);
> + break;
> default:
> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
> break;
>
Thomas
- Re: [PATCH 04/15] Header sync protvirt, (continued)
[PATCH 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/20
[PATCH 05/15] s390x: protvirt: Sync PV state, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/20
[PATCH 08/15] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes, Janosch Frank, 2019/11/20