[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] s390x/mmu: Convert to non-recursive page table walk
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] s390x/mmu: Convert to non-recursive page table walk |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:17:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
>> break;
>> case ASCE_TYPE_SEGMENT:
>> if (VADDR_REGION1_TX(vaddr) || VADDR_REGION2_TX(vaddr) ||
>> @@ -253,11 +164,112 @@ static int mmu_translate_asce(CPUS390XState *env,
>> target_ulong vaddr,
>> if (VADDR_SEGMENT_TL(vaddr) > asce_tl) {
>> return PGM_SEGMENT_TRANS;
>> }
>> + gaddr += VADDR_SEGMENT_TX(vaddr) * 8;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + g_assert_not_reached();
>
> As far as I can see, all four cases are handled above, so this default
> case should really not be necessary here.
Yes, can drop.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + switch (asce & ASCE_TYPE_MASK) {
>> + case ASCE_TYPE_REGION1:
>> + if (!read_table_entry(env, gaddr, &entry)) {
>> + return PGM_ADDRESSING;
>> + }
>> + if (entry & REGION_ENTRY_I) {
>> + return PGM_REG_FIRST_TRANS;
>> + }
>> + if ((entry & REGION_ENTRY_TT) != REGION_ENTRY_TT_REGION1) {
>> + return PGM_TRANS_SPEC;
>> + }
>> + if (VADDR_REGION2_TL(vaddr) < (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TF) >> 6 ||
>> + VADDR_REGION2_TL(vaddr) > (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TL)) {
>> + return PGM_REG_SEC_TRANS;
>> + }
>> + if (edat1 && (entry & REGION_ENTRY_P)) {
>> + *flags &= ~PAGE_WRITE;
>> + }
>> + gaddr = (entry & REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN) + VADDR_REGION2_TX(vaddr) * 8;
>> + /* fall through */
>> + case ASCE_TYPE_REGION2:
>> + if (!read_table_entry(env, gaddr, &entry)) {
>> + return PGM_ADDRESSING;
>> + }
>> + if (entry & REGION_ENTRY_I) {
>> + return PGM_REG_SEC_TRANS;
>> + }
>> + if ((entry & REGION_ENTRY_TT) != REGION_ENTRY_TT_REGION2) {
>> + return PGM_TRANS_SPEC;
>> + }
>> + if (VADDR_REGION3_TL(vaddr) < (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TF) >> 6 ||
>> + VADDR_REGION3_TL(vaddr) > (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TL)) {
>> + return PGM_REG_THIRD_TRANS;
>> + }
>> + if (edat1 && (entry & REGION_ENTRY_P)) {
>> + *flags &= ~PAGE_WRITE;
>> + }
>> + gaddr = (entry & REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN) + VADDR_REGION3_TX(vaddr) * 8;
>> + /* fall through */
>> + case ASCE_TYPE_REGION3:
>> + if (!read_table_entry(env, gaddr, &entry)) {
>> + return PGM_ADDRESSING;
>> + }
>> + if (entry & REGION_ENTRY_I) {
>> + return PGM_REG_THIRD_TRANS;
>> + }
>> + if ((entry & REGION_ENTRY_TT) != REGION_ENTRY_TT_REGION3) {
>> + return PGM_TRANS_SPEC;
>> + }
>> + if (edat1 && (entry & REGION_ENTRY_P)) {
>> + *flags &= ~PAGE_WRITE;
>> + }
>
> Shouldn't that check be done below the next if-statement?
Does it matter? The flags are irrelevant in case we return an exception,
so the order shouldn't matter.
>
>> + if (VADDR_SEGMENT_TL(vaddr) < (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TF) >> 6 ||
>> + VADDR_SEGMENT_TL(vaddr) > (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TL)) {
>> + return PGM_SEGMENT_TRANS;
>> + }
>> + gaddr = (entry & REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN) + VADDR_SEGMENT_TX(vaddr) * 8;
>> + /* fall through */
>> + case ASCE_TYPE_SEGMENT:
>> + if (!read_table_entry(env, gaddr, &entry)) {
>> + return PGM_ADDRESSING;
>> + }
>> + if (entry & SEGMENT_ENTRY_I) {
>> + return PGM_SEGMENT_TRANS;
>> + }
>> + if ((entry & SEGMENT_ENTRY_TT) != SEGMENT_ENTRY_TT_SEGMENT) {
>> + return PGM_TRANS_SPEC;
>> + }
>> + if ((entry & SEGMENT_ENTRY_CS) && asce_p) {
>> + return PGM_TRANS_SPEC;
>> + }
>> + if (entry & SEGMENT_ENTRY_P) {
>> + *flags &= ~PAGE_WRITE;
>> + }
>> + if (edat1 && (entry & SEGMENT_ENTRY_FC)) {
>> + *raddr = (entry & SEGMENT_ENTRY_SFAA) |
>> + (vaddr & ~SEGMENT_ENTRY_SFAA);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + gaddr = (entry & SEGMENT_ENTRY_ORIGIN) + VADDR_PAGE_TX(vaddr) * 8;
>> break;
>> + default:
>> + g_assert_not_reached();
>
> That default case could be dropped, too.
Yes, can do.
Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb