[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[qemu-s390x] [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] s390: stop abusing memory_region_allocat
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
[qemu-s390x] [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] s390: stop abusing memory_region_allocate_system_memory() |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Aug 2019 05:38:50 -0400 |
Changelog:
since v1:
- include 4.2 machines patch for adding compat RAM layout on top
- 2/4 add missing in v1 patch for splitting too big MemorySection on
several memslots
- 3/4 amend code path on alias destruction to ensure that RAMBlock is
cleaned properly
- 4/4 add compat machine code to keep old layout (migration-wise) for
4.1 and older machines
While looking into unifying guest RAM allocation to use hostmem backends
for initial RAM (especially when -mempath is used) and retiring
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API, leaving only single hostmem backend,
I was inspecting how currently it is used by boards and it turns out several
boards abuse it by calling the function several times (despite documented
contract
forbiding it).
s390 is one of such boards where KVM limitation on memslot size got propagated
to board design and memory_region_allocate_system_memory() was abused to satisfy
KVM requirement for max RAM chunk where memory region alias would suffice.
Unfortunately, memory_region_allocate_system_memory() usage created migration
dependency where guest RAM is transferred in migration stream as several
RAMBlocks
if it's more than KVM_SLOT_MAX_BYTES.
In order to replace these several RAM chunks with a single memdev and keep it
working with KVM memslot size limit and migration compatible, following was
done:
* [2/4] split too big RAM chunk inside of KVM code on several memory slots
if necessary
* [4/4] use memory region aliases to partition hostmem backend RAM on
KVM_SLOT_MAX_BYTES chunks, which should keep KVM side working
* [3/4] hacked memory region aliases (to ram memory regions only) to have
its own RAMBlocks pointing to RAM chunks owned by aliased memory
region. While it's admittedly a hack, but it's relatively simple and
allows board code re-shape migration stream as necessary
I haven't tried to use migratable aliases on x86 machines, but with
it
it could be possible to drop legacy RAM allocation and compat knob
(cd5ff8333a) dropping '-numa node,mem' completely even for old
machines.
PS:
Tested with ping pong cross version migration on s390 machine and x86 pc/q35
(with reduced KVM_SLOT_MAX_BYTES since I don't have access to large
enough host)
CC: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
Cornelia Huck (1):
hw: add compat machines for 4.2
Igor Mammedov (3):
kvm: s390: split too big memory section on several memslots
memory: make MemoryRegion alias migratable
s390: do not call memory_region_allocate_system_memory() multiple
times
include/hw/boards.h | 3 ++
include/hw/i386/pc.h | 3 ++
include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h | 14 ++++++
include/sysemu/kvm_int.h | 1 +
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++------------
exec.c | 9 ++--
hw/arm/virt.c | 9 +++-
hw/core/machine.c | 3 ++
hw/i386/pc.c | 3 ++
hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 14 +++++-
hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 13 ++++-
hw/ppc/spapr.c | 15 +++++-
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
memory.c | 6 +++
target/s390x/kvm.c | 1 +
15 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
--
2.18.1
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] s390: stop abusing memory_region_allocate_system_memory(),
Igor Mammedov <=
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] s390: stop abusing memory_region_allocate_system_memory(), no-reply, 2019/08/02
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] s390: stop abusing memory_region_allocate_system_memory(), no-reply, 2019/08/02