[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-20
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-2012 license statements |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:31:02 +0100 |
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:24:48 +0100
Alexander Graf <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 02/06/2019 02:02 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > On 06/02/2019 13:58, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:41:33 +0100
> >> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The license information in these files is rather confusing. The text
> >>> declares LGPL first, but then says that contributions after 2012 are
> >>> licensed under the GPL instead. How should the average user who just
> >>> downloaded the release tarball know which part is now GPL and which
> >>> is LGPL?
> >> FWIW, that statement was added in ccb084d3f0ec ("s390: new
> >> contributions GPLv2 or later").
> >>
> >>> Looking at the text of the LGPL (see COPYING.LIB in the top directory),
> >>> the license clearly states how this should be done instead:
> >>>
> >>> "3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public
> >>> License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. To do
> >>> this, you must alter all the notices that refer to this License, so
> >>> that they refer to the ordinary GNU General Public License, version 2,
> >>> instead of to this License."
> >> Hm. This talks about GPL v2, not GPL v2-or-later...
> >>
> >>> Thus let's clean up the confusing statements and use the proper GPL
> >>> text only.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> >>> ---
> >>> linux-user/s390x/target_cpu.h | 19 ++++++++-----------
> >>> target/s390x/cpu.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> >>> target/s390x/cpu.h | 19 ++++++++-----------
> >>> target/s390x/kvm.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> >> BTW: Is the original author of the code still around?
> > For the linux-user/s390x/target_cpu.h, it seems this code has been pushed
> > by Alex Graf:
> >
> > commit 10ec51174ca69a4c3c5149b0b3baaa6ccba66273
> > Author: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat Dec 5 12:44:21 2009 +0100
> >
> > S/390 CPU fake emulation
> >
> > Because Qemu currently requires a TCG target to exist and there are
> > quite some
> > useful helpers here to lay the groundwork for out KVM target, let's
> > create a
> > stub TCG emulation target for S390X CPUs.
> >
> > This is required to make tcg happy. The emulation target itself won't
> > work
> > though.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <address@hidden>
> >
> > But the "(c) 2009 Ulrich Hecht" is confusing.
>
> Why? Ulrich was the one that started the port, I then cleaned it up,
> improved it, added system emulation and upstreamed it.
It's just a bit confusing that Ulrich does not show up in the sign-off
chain.
> What problem exactly are you trying to solve?
The confusing license statements?
I thought I'd ask whether the original author had any thoughts; if you
think this patch is problematic, I can dequeue it again.
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-2012 license statements, Christian Borntraeger, 2019/02/06
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-2012 license statements, Cornelia Huck, 2019/02/11