Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 0/4] s390x/zpci: some hotplug handler cleanups

[David Hildenbrand]

On 13.11.18 10:03, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:34:34 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On 12.11.18 18:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Mon,  5 Nov 2018 12:03:09 +0100
>>> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> The hotplug code needs more love, but let's do some obvious cleanups
>>>> first. In the future, we want to propery make use of unplug_request() +
>>>> unplug(), instead of routing everything (especially two separate but
>>>> linked) devices via a single unplug call. Also, we want to move all
>>>> errors in plug() into the pre_plug() handler, but this will require
>>>> general PCI refactorings (moving stuff from realize() to the pre_plug/plug
>>>> handler).
>>>>
>>>> This series is based on "[PATCH v2 00/10] pci: hotplug handler reworks",
>>>> which contains one cleanup for s390x.
>>>>
>>>> David Hildenbrand (4):
>>>>   s390x/zpci: drop msix.available  
>>>
>>> queued to s390-next
>>>   
>>>>   s390x/zpci: use hotplug_dev instead of looking up the host bridge  
>>>
>>> Do we have consensus on that one yet? I can take it or leave it :)
>>>   
>>>>   s390x/zpci: move some hotplug checks to the pre_plug handler  
>>>
>>> depends on the handler rework  
>>
>> I can pull that one out from the general handler rework (still need
>> review either way so it could take a while).
> 
> It's 4.0 material anyway, so no need to hurry.
> 
>>
>>>   
>>>>   s390x/zpci: properly fail if the zPCI device cannot be created  
>>>
>>> Waiting for a fixed patch... can queue to s390-fixes if it arrives
>>> soon(tm).  
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Shall I resend all or only this one?
> 
> The last one would be great, as I think it's still 3.1 material.
> 

Alrighty, so I'll resend (after testing this time ;) ) the last patch.

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb