Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 2/9] s390x/kvm: pass values instead of pointers to kvm_s390_set_clock_*()

[David Hildenbrand]

On 25.06.2018 17:50, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:53:45 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> We are going to factor out the TOD into a separate device and use const
>> pointers for device class functions where possible. We are passing right
>> now ordinary pointers that should never be touched when setting the TOD.
>> Let's just pass the values directly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/s390x/cpu.c       |  4 ++--
>>  target/s390x/kvm-stub.c  |  4 ++--
>>  target/s390x/kvm.c       | 12 ++++++------
>>  target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h |  4 ++--
>>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> index c268065887..68512e3e54 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> @@ -413,9 +413,9 @@ int s390_set_clock(uint8_t *tod_high, uint64_t *tod_low)
> 
> Any reason why you keep the pointers here?
> 
>>      int r = 0;
>>  
>>      if (kvm_enabled()) {
>> -        r = kvm_s390_set_clock_ext(tod_high, tod_low);
>> +        r = kvm_s390_set_clock_ext(*tod_high, *tod_low);
>>          if (r == -ENXIO) {
>> -            return kvm_s390_set_clock(tod_high, tod_low);
>> +            return kvm_s390_set_clock(*tod_high, *tod_low);
> 
> Especially as it would be more clean to check for !NULL before
> dereferencing...

See the next patch :)

(I assume that refactoring code in order to rip it out does not make sense)

> 
>>          }
>>      }
>>      /* Fixme TCG */


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb