[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] virtio-ccw.c vs larger VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX (coverity warni
From: |
Halil Pasic |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] virtio-ccw.c vs larger VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX (coverity warning CID 1390619) |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2018 15:17:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
On 05/15/2018 02:07 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 15 May 2018 at 13:00, Halil Pasic <address@hidden> wrote:
To sum it up, my take on the whole is the diff below. I can convert
it to a proper patch if we agree that's the way to go.
From: Halil Pasic <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 13:57:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] WIP: cleanup virtio notify
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <address@hidden>
---
hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
index e51fbefd23..22078605d1 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
@@ -1003,10 +1003,8 @@ static void virtio_ccw_notify(DeviceState *d,
uint16_t vector)
SubchDev *sch = ccw_dev->sch;
uint64_t indicators;
- /* queue indicators + secondary indicators */
- if (vector >= VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX + 64) {
- return;
- }
+ /* vector == VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX means configuration change */
+ assert(vector <= VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX);
if (vector < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX) {
if (!dev->indicators) {
This will not be sufficient to satisfy Coverity, because
VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX is 1024, and that is way too big to use as
a shift count, and that's the only check that Coverity can see
on the code path leading into the "1ULL << vector" code.
If it's not possible to get here with a vector that's 64 or more,
you need to
assert(vector < NR_CLASSIC_INDICATOR_BITS);
somewhere.
Right. Here is the revised version. It's the second hunk.
Regards,
Halil
thanks
-- PMM
--------------------------------8<------------------------------------------------
From: Halil Pasic <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 13:57:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] WIP: cleanup virtio notify
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <address@hidden>
---
hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
index 22df33b509..be433b0336 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
@@ -1003,10 +1003,8 @@ static void virtio_ccw_notify(DeviceState *d, uint16_t
vector)
SubchDev *sch = ccw_dev->sch;
uint64_t indicators;
- /* queue indicators + secondary indicators */
- if (vector >= VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX + 64) {
- return;
- }
+ /* vector == VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX means configuration change */
+ assert(vector <= VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX);
if (vector < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX) {
if (!dev->indicators) {
@@ -1029,6 +1027,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_notify(DeviceState *d, uint16_t
vector)
css_adapter_interrupt(CSS_IO_ADAPTER_VIRTIO, dev->thinint_isc);
}
} else {
+ assert(vector < NR_CLASSIC_INDICATOR_BITS);
indicators = address_space_ldq(&address_space_memory,
dev->indicators->addr,
MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
@@ -1042,12 +1041,11 @@ static void virtio_ccw_notify(DeviceState *d, uint16_t
vector)
if (!dev->indicators2) {
return;
}
- vector = 0;
indicators = address_space_ldq(&address_space_memory,
dev->indicators2->addr,
MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL);
- indicators |= 1ULL << vector;
+ indicators |= 1ULL;
address_space_stq(&address_space_memory, dev->indicators2->addr,
indicators, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
css_conditional_io_interrupt(sch);
Re: [qemu-s390x] virtio-ccw.c vs larger VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX (coverity warning CID 1390619), Cornelia Huck, 2018/05/15