|
From: | Halil Pasic |
Subject: | Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/6] s390x/vfio: ap: Introduce VFIO AP device |
Date: | Fri, 11 May 2018 12:29:58 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
On 05/10/2018 03:10 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If I did not. I think this is a big problem. We need to at least zeroize the queues (e.g. on system reset) to avoid leaking sensitive information. Without this, there is no sane way to use ap-passthrough. Or am I wrong?I do not have a definitive answer, I will have to look into it. I'm thinking that since we are using ap-passthrough, the AP bus running on the guest would be responsible for handling reset possibly by resetting or zeroizing its queues. I'll get back to you on this.
You are on the wrong track. What I'm talking about is the responsibility of the hypervisor and not the responsibility of the guest. Regards, Halil
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |