[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1] numa: s390x has no NUMA
From: |
Claudio Imbrenda |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1] numa: s390x has no NUMA |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:49:44 +0100 |
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:36:57 +0100
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> Right now it is possible to crash QEMU for s390x by providing e.g.
> -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1
>
> Problem is, that numa.c uses mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props as an
> indicator whether NUMA is supported by a machine type. We don't
> implement NUMA on s390x (and that concept also doesn't really exist).
> We need mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props for query-cpus.
>
> So let's fix this case.
>
> qemu-system-s390x: -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1: NUMA is not
> supported by this machine-type
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> ---
> numa.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
> index 7e0e789b02..3b9be613d9 100644
> --- a/numa.c
> +++ b/numa.c
> @@ -80,10 +80,16 @@ static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms,
> NumaNodeOptions *node, return;
> }
>
> +#ifdef TARGET_S390X
> + /* s390x provides cpu_index_to_instance_props but has no NUMA */
> + error_report("NUMA is not supported by this machine-type");
> + exit(1);
> +#else
> if (!mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props) {
> error_report("NUMA is not supported by this machine-type");
> exit(1);
> }
> +#endif
> for (cpus = node->cpus; cpus; cpus = cpus->next) {
> CpuInstanceProperties props;
> if (cpus->value >= max_cpus) {
seems straightforward
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <address@hidden>