[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 0/3] s390x/sclp: 64 bit event masks
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 0/3] s390x/sclp: 64 bit event masks |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:37:55 +0100 |
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:22:56 +0100
Claudio Imbrenda <address@hidden> wrote:
> Until 67915de9f0383ccf4a ("s390x/event-facility: variable-length event masks")
> we only supported 32bit sclp event masks, even though the archiecture
> allows the guests to set up sclp event masks up to 1021 bytes in length.
> With that patch the behaviour was almost compliant, but some issues were
> still remaining, in particular regarding the handling of selective reads
> and migration.
>
> This patchset fixes migration and the handling of selective reads, and
> puts in place the support for 64-bit sclp event masks internally.
>
> A new property of the sclp-event device switches between the 32bit masks
> and the compliant behaviour. The property is bound to the machine
> version, so older machines keep the old broken behaviour, allowing for
> migration, but the default is the compliant implementation.
>
> Fixes: 67915de9f0383ccf4a ("s390x/event-facility: variable-length event
> masks")
>
> v1 -> v2
> * improved comments and patch descriptions to better explain why we need
> this, including better description of the old broken behaviour
> * rename SCLPEVMSK to SCLP_EVMASK to improve readability
> * removed some unneded variable initializations
> * fixed a pre-existing typo
>
> Claudio Imbrenda (3):
> s390x/sclp: proper support of larger send and receive masks
> s390x/sclp: clean up sclp masks
> s390x/sclp: extend SCLP event masks to 64 bits
>
> hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c | 4 +-
> hw/char/sclpconsole.c | 4 +-
> hw/s390x/event-facility.c | 150
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 8 +-
> hw/s390x/sclpcpu.c | 4 +-
> hw/s390x/sclpquiesce.c | 4 +-
> include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h | 22 +++---
> 7 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
This looks sane as far as I can see without having access to the
documentation.
BTW, I saw you also extended the masks in the Linux (guest) code (at
least, I see patches queued on the s390 features branch...) You also
might want to adjust the "Linux uses 4 byte masks" comment in the code
in the future.
Before I queue this, I'd like some r-bs/a-bs by folks with access to
the documentation.