Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v5 05/12] s390-ccw: move auxiliary IPL data to separate location

[Collin L. Walling]

On 02/06/2018 05:13 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 06.02.2018 10:23, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 05.02.2018 21:57, Collin L. Walling wrote:
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
> > > index e857ce4..825a1a3 100644
> > > --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
> > > +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
> > > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ char stack[PAGE_SIZE * 8] 
> > > __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)));
> > >   static SubChannelId blk_schid = { .one = 1 };
> > >   IplParameterBlock iplb __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)));
> > >   static char loadparm[8] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
> > > +QemuIplParameters qipl;
> > >   
> > >   /*
> > >    * Priniciples of Operations (SA22-7832-09) chapter 17 requires that
> > > @@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ static void virtio_setup(void)
> > >       uint16_t dev_no;
> > >       char ldp[] = "LOADPARM=[________]\n";
> > >       VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
> > > +    QemuIplParameters *early_qipl = (QemuIplParameters *)204;
> > Could you please introduce a proper #define for that magic 204 value
> > (and use it in s390_ipl_prepare_qipl, too)? ... so that it is later
> > easier to grep for this.
> Hm ... I was following the pattern established in
> write_subsystem_identification(). Christian, what is your opinion?

Any updates on this?  Last change I need to make before the next post.

--
- Collin L Walling