[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qmp: add architecture specific
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qmp: add architecture specific cpu data for query-cpus-fast |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:17:30 +0100 |
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:12:50 +0100
Viktor Mihajlovski <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 12.02.2018 17:23, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> [...]
> >> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> >> index 6df6660..af67826 100644
> >> --- a/cpus.c
> >> +++ b/cpus.c
> >> @@ -2166,6 +2166,10 @@ CpuInfoFastList *qmp_query_cpus_fast(Error **errp)
> >> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> >> CpuInfoFastList *head = NULL, *cur_item = NULL;
> >> CPUState *cpu;
> >> +#if defined(TARGET_S390X)
> >> + S390CPU *s390_cpu;
> >> + CPUS390XState *env;
> >> +#endif
> >>
> >> CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
> >> CpuInfoFastList *info = g_malloc0(sizeof(*info));
> >> @@ -2183,6 +2187,12 @@ CpuInfoFastList *qmp_query_cpus_fast(Error **errp)
> >> info->value->props = props;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +#if defined(TARGET_S390X)
> >> + s390_cpu = S390_CPU(cpu);
> >> + env = &s390_cpu->env;
> >
> > You should be able to omit the s390_cpu variable by using
> >
> > env = &S390_CPU(cpu)->env;
> >
> True, but I wanted to stay in style with the code in qmp_query_cpus.
TBH, I don't care too much one way or the other :)
> >> + info->value->arch = CPU_INFO_ARCH_S390;
> >> + info->value->u.s390.cpu_state = env->cpu_state;
> >> +#endif
> >> if (!cur_item) {
> >> head = cur_item = info;
> >> } else {
> >
> > As you mentioned in the patch description, the duplication is a bit
> > awkward. I'll let the QAPI experts judge that; otherwise, this looks
> > fine to me.
> >
>
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH 1/3] qmp: expose s390-specific CPU info, (continued)
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH 0/3] add query-cpu-fast and related s390 changes, Cornelia Huck, 2018/02/12