[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for
From: |
Christian Borntraeger |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Feb 2018 12:22:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 |
Looks sane on a z14.
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>
On 02/05/2018 11:29 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -2221,6 +2221,14 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model,
> Error **errp)
> return;
> }
>
> + /* PTFF subfunctions might be indicated although kernel support missing
> */
> + if (!test_bit(S390_FEAT_MULTIPLE_EPOCH, model->features)) {
> + clear_bit(S390_FEAT_PTFF_QSIE, model->features);
> + clear_bit(S390_FEAT_PTFF_QTOUE, model->features);
> + clear_bit(S390_FEAT_PTFF_STOE, model->features);
> + clear_bit(S390_FEAT_PTFF_STOUE, model->features);
> + }
> +
> /* with cpu model support, CMM is only indicated if really available */
> if (kvm_s390_cmma_available()) {
> set_bit(S390_FEAT_CMM, model->features);
>
Do you also want to add something to check_consistency ?
Right now the following user error
-cpu z14,mepoch=off,mepochptff=on
is accepted.
On the other hand we also have no consistency checks for other subfunctions.
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, David Hildenbrand, 2018/02/05
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, no-reply, 2018/02/05
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility,
Christian Borntraeger <=
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, David Hildenbrand, 2018/02/05
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, Cornelia Huck, 2018/02/05
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, David Hildenbrand, 2018/02/05
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, Cornelia Huck, 2018/02/06
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, David Hildenbrand, 2018/02/06
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, Christian Borntraeger, 2018/02/06
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, Christian Borntraeger, 2018/02/06
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility, Cornelia Huck, 2018/02/06