[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17 |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:14:47 +0000 |
On 23 January 2018 at 10:34, Christian Ehrhardt
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Also adding Suraj for a statement in this regard about his "[QEMU-PPC]
> [PATCH V5 0/7] target/ppc: Rework spapr_caps" series which I think is
> the PPC version of all of this right?
> Not sure who to add for Arm :-/
AIUI for Arm no QEMU changes should be required -- KVM VMs always
use the same CPU type as the host, and the kernel always exposes
the same MIDR (main ID register) value to the guest as the host has,
and the guest kernel fixes will key off the MIDR.
thanks
-- PMM
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Christian Borntraeger, 2018/01/23
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Cornelia Huck, 2018/01/23
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Christian Ehrhardt, 2018/01/23
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Michael Roth, 2018/01/23
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Eduardo Habkost, 2018/01/23
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Michael Roth, 2018/01/25
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Eduardo Habkost, 2018/01/25
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Michael Roth, 2018/01/26
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Eduardo Habkost, 2018/01/26
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] x86 queue, 2018-01-17, Peter Maydell, 2018/01/26