[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x: Add missing QEMU_NORETURN a
From: |
Stefan Weil |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x: Add missing QEMU_NORETURN attribute (CID 1383842) |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:58:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
Am 17.12.2017 um 11:25 schrieb address@hidden:
> Hi,
>
> This series failed build test on s390x host. Please find the details below.
[...]
> /var/tmp/patchew-tester-tmp-e2qiwzsb/src/target/s390x/interrupt.c: In
> function ‘s390_program_interrupt’:
> /var/tmp/patchew-tester-tmp-e2qiwzsb/src/target/s390x/interrupt.c:55:1:
> error: ‘noreturn’ function does return [-Werror]
Obviously the s390x compiler does more checks than my x86 gcc.
To fix the new warning, QEMU_NORETURN would have to be added to
kvm_s390_program_interrupt and tcg_s390_program_interrupt, too.
I am not sure about kvm_s390_program_interrupt. Is it a function which
will never return? Then the current code (which includes a return
statement in kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt) is not correct.
We could also move the g_assert_not_reached in s390_program_interrupt to
the end of the function. That should satisfy the compiler as well.
Or we could suppress the s390x compiler warning by using a compiler
pragma. But I don't like that alternative.
Regards
Stefan
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x: Add missing QEMU_NORETURN attribute (CID 1383842), no-reply, 2017/12/20