[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] tests for CCW IDA
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] tests for CCW IDA |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Dec 2017 07:38:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
On 08.11.2017 17:54, Halil Pasic wrote:
> I've keept the title althogh the scope shifted a bit: it's
> more about introducing ccw-testdev than about IDA. The goal
> is to facilitate testing the virtual channel subsystem
> implementation, and the ccw interpretation.
>
> The first patch is the interesting one. See it's cover letter
> for details. The RFC is about discussing some technical issues
> with this patch.
>
> The other two patches are an out of source kernel module which
> is basically only there so you can try out the first patch. The
> tests there should probably be ported to something else. I don't
> know what: maybe kvm-unit-tests, maybe qtest+libqos, or maybe some
> bios based test image. We still have to figure out that.
I think both, kvm-unit-tests or qtest+libqos would be good candidates.
Please don't invent a new bios base test image, since kvm-unit-tests
should be very similar already and we really don't need to duplicate
work here.
Anyway, you'd need to add some CSS infracture there first (in both
kvm-unit-tests and the qtest environments), so it's likely a similar
amount of work. qtest has the advantage that it gets checked
automatically during "make check" each time, so I'd have a weak
preference for that one.
Thomas
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] tests for CCW IDA,
Thomas Huth <=