[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx
From: |
Wu, Fei |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:00:06 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 |
On 3/23/2023 1:37 PM, LIU Zhiwei wrote:
>
> On 2023/3/23 10:44, Fei Wu wrote:
>> Currently it's assumed the 2 low bits of mmu_idx map to privilege mode,
>> this assumption won't last as we are about to add more mmu_idx.
> For patch set has more than 1 patch, usually add a cover letter.
This is cover letter:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg950849.html
I added scripts/get_maintainer.pl to .git/config, it couldn't find out
the maintainers for the cover letter, so I added the mail lists to "To"
manually.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fei Wu <fei2.wu@intel.com>
>> ---
>> target/riscv/cpu.h | 1 -
>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 2 +-
>> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc | 2 +-
>> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc | 7 +------
>> target/riscv/translate.c | 3 +++
>> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> index 638e47c75a..66f7e3d1ba 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> @@ -623,7 +623,6 @@ G_NORETURN void
>> riscv_raise_exception(CPURISCVState *env,
>> target_ulong riscv_cpu_get_fflags(CPURISCVState *env);
>> void riscv_cpu_set_fflags(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong);
>> -#define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK 3
>> #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_HYP_ACCESS_MASK (1 << 2)
>> #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS MSTATUS_FS
>> #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_VS MSTATUS_VS
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>> index f88c503cf4..76e1b0100e 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>> @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState
>> *env, hwaddr *physical,
>> * (riscv_cpu_do_interrupt) is correct */
>> MemTxResult res;
>> MemTxAttrs attrs = MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED;
>> - int mode = mmu_idx & TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK;
>> + int mode = env->priv;
>> bool use_background = false;
>> hwaddr ppn;
>> RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc
>> b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc
>> index 59501b2780..9305b18299 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc
>> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static bool trans_ebreak(DisasContext *ctx,
>> arg_ebreak *a)
>> * that no exception will be raised when fetching them.
>> */
>> - if (semihosting_enabled(ctx->mem_idx < PRV_S) &&
>> + if (semihosting_enabled(ctx->priv < PRV_S) &&
>> (pre_addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == (post_addr &
>> TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
>> pre = opcode_at(&ctx->base, pre_addr);
>> ebreak = opcode_at(&ctx->base, ebreak_addr);
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc
>> b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc
>> index df504c3f2c..adfb53cb4c 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc
>> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc
>> @@ -265,12 +265,7 @@ static bool trans_th_tst(DisasContext *ctx,
>> arg_th_tst *a)
>> static inline int priv_level(DisasContext *ctx)
>> {
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> - return PRV_U;
>> -#else
>> - /* Priv level is part of mem_idx. */
>> - return ctx->mem_idx & TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK;
>> -#endif
>> + return ctx->priv;
>> }
>> /* Test if priv level is M, S, or U (cannot fail). */
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
>> index 0ee8ee147d..e8880f9423 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/translate.c
>> +++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ typedef struct DisasContext {
>> uint32_t mstatus_hs_fs;
>> uint32_t mstatus_hs_vs;
>> uint32_t mem_idx;
>> + uint32_t priv;
>> /* Remember the rounding mode encoded in the previous fp
>> instruction,
>> which we have already installed into env->fp_status. Or -1 for
>> no previous fp instruction. Note that we exit the TB when
>> writing
>> @@ -1162,8 +1163,10 @@ static void
>> riscv_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs)
>> } else {
>> ctx->virt_enabled = false;
>> }
>> + ctx->priv = env->priv;
>
> This is not right. You should put env->priv into tb flags before you use
> it in translation.
>
I see some other env usages in this function, when will env->priv and
tb_flags.priv mismatch (assume we have recorded priv in tb_flags)?
Thanks,
Fei.
> Zhiwei
>
>> #else
>> ctx->virt_enabled = false;
>> + ctx->priv = PRV_U;
>> #endif
>> ctx->misa_ext = env->misa_ext;
>> ctx->frm = -1; /* unknown rounding mode */
- [PATCH v4 0/2] target/riscv: reduce MSTATUS_SUM overhead, Fei Wu, 2023/03/22
- [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Fei Wu, 2023/03/22
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, LIU Zhiwei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx,
Wu, Fei <=
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Wu, Fei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, LIU Zhiwei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Wu, Fei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Richard Henderson, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Wu, Fei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Richard Henderson, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Wu, Fei, 2023/03/23
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Richard Henderson, 2023/03/23