[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI ta
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:55:47 +0100 |
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 08:10:32PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Add few basic ACPI tables and DSDT with few devices in a
> new file virt-acpi-build.c.
>
> These are mostly leveraged from arm64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> hw/riscv/virt-acpi-build.c | 285 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/riscv/virt.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 286 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 hw/riscv/virt-acpi-build.c
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/riscv/virt-acpi-build.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..3c4da6c385
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/riscv/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
> +/*
> + * Support for generating ACPI tables and passing them to Guests
> + *
> + * RISC-V virt ACPI generation
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2008-2010 Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>
> + * Copyright (C) 2006 Fabrice Bellard
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat Inc
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD.
> + * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 Ventana Micro Systems Inc
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> +
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> +
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
> + * with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h"
> +#include "hw/acpi/acpi.h"
> +#include "hw/acpi/aml-build.h"
> +#include "hw/riscv/virt.h"
> +#include "hw/riscv/numa.h"
> +#include "hw/acpi/pci.h"
> +#include "hw/acpi/utils.h"
> +#include "sysemu/reset.h"
> +#include "hw/pci-host/gpex.h"
We should only bring in includes as needed. Several of these are currently
unused.
> +#include "qapi/error.h"
> +#include "migration/vmstate.h"
> +
> +#define ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_SIZE 0x20000
> +
> +typedef struct AcpiBuildState {
> + /* Copy of table in RAM (for patching) */
> + MemoryRegion *table_mr;
> + MemoryRegion *rsdp_mr;
> + MemoryRegion *linker_mr;
> + /* Is table patched? */
> + bool patched;
> +} AcpiBuildState;
> +
> +static void acpi_align_size(GArray *blob, unsigned align)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Align size to multiple of given size. This reduces the chance
> + * we need to change size in the future (breaking cross version
> migration).
> + */
> + g_array_set_size(blob, ROUND_UP(acpi_data_len(blob), align));
> +}
> +
> +static void acpi_dsdt_add_cpus(Aml *scope, RISCVVirtState *s)
> +{
> + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(s);
> + uint16_t i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ms->smp.cpus; i++) {
> + Aml *dev = aml_device("C%.03X", i);
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("ACPI0007")));
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(i)));
> + aml_append(scope, dev);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +acpi_dsdt_add_fw_cfg(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *fw_cfg_memmap)
Please avoid the use of this style. It's better to wrap parameters, e.g.
static void +acpi_dsdt_add_fw_cfg(Aml *scope,
const MemMapEntry *fw_cfg_memmap)
> +{
> + Aml *dev = aml_device("FWCF");
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("QEMU0002")));
> + /* device present, functioning, decoding, not shown in UI */
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STA", aml_int(0xB)));
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CCA", aml_int(1)));
> +
> + Aml *crs = aml_resource_template();
> + aml_append(crs, aml_memory32_fixed(fw_cfg_memmap->base,
> + fw_cfg_memmap->size, AML_READ_WRITE));
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
> + aml_append(scope, dev);
> +}
> +
> +/* FADT */
> +static void
> +build_fadt_rev6(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> + RISCVVirtState *s, unsigned dsdt_tbl_offset)
> +{
> + /* ACPI v5.1 */
> + AcpiFadtData fadt = {
> + .rev = 6,
> + .minor_ver = 0,
Comment above says ACPI v5.1, but here it uses 6.0. I'd just drop the
comment.
> + .flags = 1 << ACPI_FADT_F_HW_REDUCED_ACPI,
> + .xdsdt_tbl_offset = &dsdt_tbl_offset,
> + };
> +
> + build_fadt(table_data, linker, &fadt, s->oem_id, s->oem_table_id);
> +}
> +
> +/* DSDT */
> +static void
> +build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, RISCVVirtState *s)
> +{
> + Aml *scope, *dsdt;
> + const MemMapEntry *memmap = s->memmap;
> + AcpiTable table = { .sig = "DSDT", .rev = 2, .oem_id = s->oem_id,
> + .oem_table_id = s->oem_table_id };
> +
> +
> + acpi_table_begin(&table, table_data);
> + dsdt = init_aml_allocator();
> +
> + /*
> + * When booting the VM with UEFI, UEFI takes ownership of the RTC
> hardware.
> + * While UEFI can use libfdt to disable the RTC device node in the DTB
> that
> + * it passes to the OS, it cannot modify AML. Therefore, we won't
> generate
> + * the RTC ACPI device at all when using UEFI.
> + */
> + scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
> + acpi_dsdt_add_cpus(scope, s);
> +
> + acpi_dsdt_add_fw_cfg(scope, &memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG]);
> +
> + aml_append(dsdt, scope);
> +
> + /* copy AML table into ACPI tables blob and patch header there */
> + g_array_append_vals(table_data, dsdt->buf->data, dsdt->buf->len);
> +
> + acpi_table_end(linker, &table);
> + free_aml_allocator();
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +virt_acpi_build(RISCVVirtState *s, AcpiBuildTables *tables)
> +{
> + GArray *table_offsets;
> + unsigned dsdt, xsdt;
> + GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data;
> +
> + table_offsets = g_array_new(false, true,
> + sizeof(uint32_t));
> +
> + bios_linker_loader_alloc(tables->linker,
> + ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE, tables_blob,
> + 64, false);
> +
> + /* DSDT is pointed to by FADT */
> + dsdt = tables_blob->len;
> + build_dsdt(tables_blob, tables->linker, s);
> +
> + /* FADT and others pointed to by RSDT */
> + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> + build_fadt_rev6(tables_blob, tables->linker, s, dsdt);
> +
> + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> + build_madt(tables_blob, tables->linker, s);
> +
> + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> + build_rhct(tables_blob, tables->linker, s);
> +
> + /* XSDT is pointed to by RSDP */
> + xsdt = tables_blob->len;
> + build_xsdt(tables_blob, tables->linker, table_offsets, s->oem_id,
> + s->oem_table_id);
> +
> + /* RSDP is in FSEG memory, so allocate it separately */
> + {
> + AcpiRsdpData rsdp_data = {
> + .revision = 2,
> + .oem_id = s->oem_id,
> + .xsdt_tbl_offset = &xsdt,
> + .rsdt_tbl_offset = NULL,
> + };
> + build_rsdp(tables->rsdp, tables->linker, &rsdp_data);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The align size is 128, warn if 64k is not enough therefore
> + * the align size could be resized.
> + */
> + if (tables_blob->len > ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_SIZE / 2) {
> + warn_report("ACPI table size %u exceeds %d bytes,"
> + " migration may not work",
> + tables_blob->len, ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_SIZE / 2);
> + error_printf("Try removing CPUs, NUMA nodes, memory slots"
> + " or PCI bridges.");
This error mentions things for which we don't currently generate tables.
> + }
> + acpi_align_size(tables_blob, ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_SIZE);
> +
> +
> + /* Clean up memory that's no longer used */
> + g_array_free(table_offsets, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void acpi_ram_update(MemoryRegion *mr, GArray *data)
> +{
> + uint32_t size = acpi_data_len(data);
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure RAM size is correct - in case it got changed
> + * e.g. by migration
> + */
> + memory_region_ram_resize(mr, size, &error_abort);
> +
> + memcpy(memory_region_get_ram_ptr(mr), data->data, size);
> + memory_region_set_dirty(mr, 0, size);
> +}
> +
> +static void virt_acpi_build_update(void *build_opaque)
> +{
> + AcpiBuildState *build_state = build_opaque;
> + AcpiBuildTables tables;
> +
> + /* No state to update or already patched? Nothing to do. */
> + if (!build_state || build_state->patched) {
> + return;
> + }
> + build_state->patched = true;
> +
> + acpi_build_tables_init(&tables);
> +
> + virt_acpi_build(RISCV_VIRT_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()), &tables);
> +
> + acpi_ram_update(build_state->table_mr, tables.table_data);
> + acpi_ram_update(build_state->rsdp_mr, tables.rsdp);
> + acpi_ram_update(build_state->linker_mr, tables.linker->cmd_blob);
> +
> + acpi_build_tables_cleanup(&tables, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void virt_acpi_build_reset(void *build_opaque)
> +{
> + AcpiBuildState *build_state = build_opaque;
> + build_state->patched = false;
> +}
> +
> +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_virt_acpi_build = {
> + .name = "virt_acpi_build",
> + .version_id = 1,
> + .minimum_version_id = 1,
> + .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> + VMSTATE_BOOL(patched, AcpiBuildState),
> + VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> + },
> +};
> +
> +void virt_acpi_setup(RISCVVirtState *s)
> +{
> + AcpiBuildTables tables;
> + AcpiBuildState *build_state;
> +
> + build_state = g_malloc0(sizeof *build_state);
> +
> + acpi_build_tables_init(&tables);
> + virt_acpi_build(s, &tables);
> +
> + /* Now expose it all to Guest */
> + build_state->table_mr = acpi_add_rom_blob(virt_acpi_build_update,
> + build_state, tables.table_data,
> + ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE);
> + assert(build_state->table_mr != NULL);
> +
> + build_state->linker_mr = acpi_add_rom_blob(virt_acpi_build_update,
> + build_state,
> + tables.linker->cmd_blob,
> + ACPI_BUILD_LOADER_FILE);
> +
> + build_state->rsdp_mr = acpi_add_rom_blob(virt_acpi_build_update,
> + build_state, tables.rsdp,
> + ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE);
> +
> + qemu_register_reset(virt_acpi_build_reset, build_state);
> + virt_acpi_build_reset(build_state);
> + vmstate_register(NULL, 0, &vmstate_virt_acpi_build, build_state);
> +
> + /*
> + * Clean up tables but don't free the memory: we track it
> + * in build_state.
> + */
> + acpi_build_tables_cleanup(&tables, false);
> +}
> diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/virt.h b/include/hw/riscv/virt.h
> index 379501edcc..e5c474b26e 100644
> --- a/include/hw/riscv/virt.h
> +++ b/include/hw/riscv/virt.h
> @@ -126,4 +126,5 @@ enum {
> 1 + FDT_APLIC_INT_CELLS)
>
> bool virt_is_acpi_enabled(RISCVVirtState *s);
> +void virt_acpi_setup(RISCVVirtState *vms);
> #endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Thanks,
drew
- Re: [PATCH V2 03/10] hw/riscv/virt: Add memmap pointer to RiscVVirtState, (continued)
- [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables, Sunil V L, 2023/02/13
- Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/02/13
- Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables, Sunil V L, 2023/02/13
- Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables, Bin Meng, 2023/02/13
- Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables, Andrew Jones, 2023/02/14
- Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables, Daniel Henrique Barboza, 2023/02/14
- Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables, Sunil V L, 2023/02/15
- Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables, Palmer Dabbelt, 2023/02/16
- Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables, Sunil V L, 2023/02/16
Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add basic ACPI tables,
Andrew Jones <=
[PATCH V2 05/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add RINTC in MADT, Sunil V L, 2023/02/13
[PATCH V2 06/10] hw/riscv/virt: virt-acpi-build.c: Add RHCT Table, Sunil V L, 2023/02/13
[PATCH V2 07/10] hw/riscv: meson.build: Build virt-acpi-build.c, Sunil V L, 2023/02/13
[PATCH V2 08/10] hw/riscv/Kconfig: virt: Enable ACPI config option, Sunil V L, 2023/02/13
[PATCH V2 10/10] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for RISC-V ACPI, Sunil V L, 2023/02/13