qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/4] hw/intc: sifive_plic.c: Fix interrupt priority index.


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] hw/intc: sifive_plic.c: Fix interrupt priority index.
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 17:09:12 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0

On 2/9/22 00:50, Tyler Ng wrote:
Fixes a bug in which the index of the interrupt priority is off by 1.
For example, using an IRQ number of 3 with a priority of 1 is supposed to set
plic->source_priority[2] = 1, but instead it sets
plic->source_priority[3] = 1. When an interrupt is claimed to be
serviced, it checks the index 2 instead of 3.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Ng <tkng@rivosinc.com>
---
  hw/intc/sifive_plic.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
index af4ae3630e..e75c47300a 100644
--- a/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/sifive_plic.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static void sifive_plic_write(void *opaque, hwaddr
addr, uint64_t value,
      SiFivePLICState *plic = opaque;

      if (addr_between(addr, plic->priority_base, plic->num_sources << 2)) {
-        uint32_t irq = ((addr - plic->priority_base) >> 2) + 1;
+        uint32_t irq = ((addr - plic->priority_base) >> 2) + 0;

          plic->source_priority[irq] = value & 7;
          sifive_plic_update(plic);
--
2.30.2


What about sifive_plic_read()?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]