|
From: | liweiwei |
Subject: | Re: [RFC 3/6] target/riscv: rvk: add flag support for Zk/Zkn/Zknd/Zknd/Zkne/Zknh/Zks/Zksed/Zksh/Zkr |
Date: | Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:06:17 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 |
在 2021/11/3 上午1:56, Richard Henderson 写道:
OK. I'll replace this with setting ext_zkn, ext_zks, ext_zkt true. By the way, Zkt only includes partial RVI/M/C instructions. Is it neccessary to distinguish them?On 11/1/21 11:11 PM, liweiwei wrote:+ if (cpu->cfg.ext_zk) { + cpu->cfg.ext_zbkb = true; + cpu->cfg.ext_zbkc = true; + cpu->cfg.ext_zbkx = true; + cpu->cfg.ext_zknd = true; + cpu->cfg.ext_zkne = true; + cpu->cfg.ext_zknh = true; + cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true; + }Section 2.12 lists instead the larger Zkn, Zks, Zkt extensions. I think it's better to follow that.
r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |