[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH RFC v5 05/12] target/riscv: Implement kvm_arch_put_registers
From: |
Alistair Francis |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH RFC v5 05/12] target/riscv: Implement kvm_arch_put_registers |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:46:07 +1000 |
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:56 PM Yifei Jiang <jiangyifei@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Put GPR CSR and FP registers to kvm by KVM_SET_ONE_REG ioctl
>
> Signed-off-by: Yifei Jiang <jiangyifei@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng1@huawei.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/kvm.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm.c b/target/riscv/kvm.c
> index 63485d7b65..9d1441952a 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,31 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + int i;
> + target_ulong reg;
> + CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> +
> + reg = env->pc;
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(env, regs.pc), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < 32; i++) {
> + __u64 id = kvm_riscv_reg_id(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
Can you use uint64_t for the entire series instead?
> + reg = env->gpr[i];
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -148,6 +173,70 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + target_ulong reg;
> + CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> +
> + reg = env->mstatus;
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sstatus), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + reg = env->mie;
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sie), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + reg = env->stvec;
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, stvec), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + reg = env->sscratch;
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sscratch), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + reg = env->sepc;
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sepc), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + reg = env->scause;
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, scause), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + reg = env->sbadaddr;
This will change soon-ish as my next PR converts this to stval.
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, stval), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + reg = env->mip;
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sip), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + reg = env->satp;
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, satp), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
Double line here.
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_fp(CPUState *cs)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -181,6 +270,40 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_fp(CPUState *cs)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_fp(CPUState *cs)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + int i;
> + CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> +
> + if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVD)) {
> + uint64_t reg;
> + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> + reg = env->fpr[i];
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_FP_D_REG(env, i), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) {
> + uint32_t reg;
> + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> + reg = env->fpr[i];
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_FP_F_REG(env, i), ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
> const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = {
> KVM_CAP_LAST_INFO
> };
> @@ -209,7 +332,24 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
>
> int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
> {
> - return 0;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(cs);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(cs);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = kvm_riscv_put_regs_fp(cs);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int kvm_arch_release_virq_post(int virq)
> --
> 2.19.1
>
>
- [PATCH RFC v5 00/12] Add riscv kvm accel support, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 01/12] linux-header: Update linux/kvm.h, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 06/12] target/riscv: Support start kernel directly by KVM, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 03/12] target/riscv: Implement function kvm_arch_init_vcpu, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 02/12] target/riscv: Add target/riscv/kvm.c to place the public kvm interface, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 05/12] target/riscv: Implement kvm_arch_put_registers, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- Re: [PATCH RFC v5 05/12] target/riscv: Implement kvm_arch_put_registers,
Alistair Francis <=
- [PATCH RFC v5 04/12] target/riscv: Implement kvm_arch_get_registers, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 08/12] target/riscv: Handle KVM_EXIT_RISCV_SBI exit, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 07/12] hw/riscv: PLIC update external interrupt by KVM when kvm enabled, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 11/12] target/riscv: Implement virtual time adjusting with vm state changing, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 10/12] target/riscv: Add kvm_riscv_get/put_regs_timer, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12
- [PATCH RFC v5 09/12] target/riscv: Add host cpu type, Yifei Jiang, 2021/04/12