qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH V2] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] target/riscv: Bugfix reserved bits in PTE for RV64
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:21:50 -0700

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 5:13 PM Guo Ren <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> > 在 2019年9月25日,上午7:33,Alistair Francis <address@hidden> 写道:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:58 AM <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Guo Ren <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> Highest 10 bits of PTE are reserved in riscv-privileged, ref: [1], so we
> >> need to ignore them. They can not be a part of ppn.
> >>
> >> 1: The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume II: Privileged Architecture
> >>   4.4 Sv39: Page-Based 39-bit Virtual-Memory System
> >>   4.5 Sv48: Page-Based 48-bit Virtual-Memory System
> >
> > Thanks for the patch!
> >
> > The spec says "must be zeroed by software for forward compatibility"
> > so I don't think it's correct for QEMU to zero out the bits.
> QEMU don’t zero out the bits, QEMU just ignore the bits for ppn.

Yes, from reading the spec that seems to be the correct behaviour.

>
> >
> > Does this fix a bug you are seeing?
> Yes, because we try to reuse these bits as attributes.

That isn't really a bug then, the spec says not to do that.

>
> >
> >>
> >> Changelog V2:
> >> - Bugfix pte destroyed cause boot fail
> >> - Change to AND with a mask instead of shifting both directions
> >
> > The changelog shouldn't be in the commit, it should be kept under the
> > line line below.
> I just prefer to save them in commit.

Fair, but in QEMU we don't commit the change log in the commit.

>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <address@hidden>
> >> Reviewed-by: Liu Zhiwei <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >
> > The change log should go here.
> OK, but git am we’ll lose them.
>
> >
> >> target/riscv/cpu_bits.h   | 3 +++
> >> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 3 ++-
> >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> >> index e998348..ae8aa0f 100644
> >> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> >> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> >> @@ -470,6 +470,9 @@
> >> #define PTE_D               0x080 /* Dirty */
> >> #define PTE_SOFT            0x300 /* Reserved for Software */
> >>
> >> +/* Reserved highest 10 bits in PTE */
> >> +#define PTE_RESERVED        ((target_ulong)0x3ff << 54)
> >
> > I think it's just easier to define this as 0xFFC0000000000000ULL and
> > remove the cast.
> OK follow your rule, but I still prefer prior.
>
> >
> >> +
> >> /* Page table PPN shift amount */
> >> #define PTE_PPN_SHIFT       10
> >>
> >> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> >> index 87dd6a6..7a540cc 100644
> >> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> >> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> >> @@ -258,10 +258,11 @@ restart:
> >>         }
> >> #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> >>         target_ulong pte = ldl_phys(cs->as, pte_addr);
> >> +        hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> >> #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> >>         target_ulong pte = ldq_phys(cs->as, pte_addr);
> >> +        hwaddr ppn = (pte & ~PTE_RESERVED) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> >> #endif
> >> -        hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> >
> > You don't have to move this shift
> En… Do you want this: ?
>
> #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
>         target_ulong pte = ldl_phys(cs->as, pte_addr);
> +      hwaddr ppn = pte;
> #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>          target_ulong pte = ldq_phys(cs->as, pte_addr);
> +       hwaddr ppn = (pte & ~PTE_RESERVED);
> #endif
> +        ppn = ppn >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
>

Yeah, it seems a little cleaner.

Alistair

> The pte couldn’t be destroyed, just ppn ignore the RESERVED bits.
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]