qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] target/riscv: Use TB_FLAGS_


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] target/riscv: Use TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS for floating point
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:43:55 -0700

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:44 AM Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 16:37, Alistair Francis <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Use the TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS macro when enabling floating point in the tb
> > flags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  target/riscv/cpu.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> > index eb7b5b0af3..0347be453b 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> > @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static inline void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPURISCVState 
> > *env, target_ulong *pc,
> >  #else
> >      *flags = cpu_mmu_index(env, 0);
> >      if (riscv_cpu_fp_enabled(env)) {
> > -        *flags |= env->mstatus & MSTATUS_FS;
> > +        *flags |= TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS;
> >      }
> >  #endif
>
> The old code was setting the bit in flags only if
> it was also set in env->mstatus; the new code sets
> the bit unconditionally -- deliberate change ?

Yes it is deliberate as the riscv_cpu_fp_enabled() function already
does the check. The function contains the exact same & operation
inside of it.

Alistair

>
> thanks
> -- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]