[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-riscv] [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 33/42] exec: Replac
|
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-riscv] [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 33/42] exec: Replace device_endian with MemOp |
|
Date: |
Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:29:40 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 19/08/19 20:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 16/08/19 12:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> This patch is *huge*, more than 800kB. It keeps being stuck in the the
>> filter of the qemu-s390x list each time you send it. Please:
>>
>> 1) Try to break it up in more digestible pieces, e.g. change only one
>> subsystem at a time (this is also better reviewable by people who are
>> interested in one area)
>
> This is not really possible, since the patch is basically a
> search-and-replace. You could perhaps use some magic
> ("DEVICE_MEMOP_ENDIAN" or something like that) to allow a split, but it
> would introduce more complication than anything else.
I'm stupid, at this point of the series it _would_ be possible to split
the patch by subsystem. Still not sure it would be actually an advantage.
Paolo
> Agreed on the HTML though. :)
>
> Paolo
>
- [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 38/42] memory: Single byte swap along the I/O path, (continued)
[Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 33/42] exec: Replace device_endian with MemOp, tony.nguyen, 2019/08/16
Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 00/42] Invert Endian bit in SPARCv9 MMU TTE, Richard Henderson, 2019/08/18