[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 17/43] target/ppc/mmu_common.c: Remove ptem field from mmu_ct
From: |
Nicholas Piggin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 17/43] target/ppc/mmu_common.c: Remove ptem field from mmu_ctx_t |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Jul 2024 16:26:22 +1000 |
On Mon May 27, 2024 at 9:12 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Instead of passing around ptem in context use it once in the same
> function so it can be removed from mmu_ctx_t.
The downside here is now updating the SPRs in different places.
You already passed hash back with a pointer elsewhere, what about
passing ptmem back? I woud prefer that but you're maintaining
this code so if you prefer this... Either way,
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
> ---
> target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> index 784e833ff2..339df377e8 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
> typedef struct {
> hwaddr raddr; /* Real address */
> int prot; /* Protection bits */
> - target_ulong ptem; /* Virtual segment ID | API */
> int key; /* Access key */
> } mmu_ctx_t;
>
> @@ -95,16 +94,18 @@ int ppc6xx_tlb_getnum(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong
> eaddr,
>
> static int ppc6xx_tlb_check(CPUPPCState *env,
> mmu_ctx_t *ctx, target_ulong eaddr,
> - MMUAccessType access_type, bool nx)
> + MMUAccessType access_type, target_ulong ptem,
> + bool nx)
> {
> ppc6xx_tlb_t *tlb;
> target_ulong *pte1p;
> int nr, best, way, ret;
> + bool is_code = (access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH);
>
> best = -1;
> ret = -1; /* No TLB found */
> for (way = 0; way < env->nb_ways; way++) {
> - nr = ppc6xx_tlb_getnum(env, eaddr, way, access_type ==
> MMU_INST_FETCH);
> + nr = ppc6xx_tlb_getnum(env, eaddr, way, is_code);
> tlb = &env->tlb.tlb6[nr];
> /* This test "emulates" the PTE index match for hardware TLBs */
> if ((eaddr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) != tlb->EPN) {
> @@ -124,7 +125,7 @@ static int ppc6xx_tlb_check(CPUPPCState *env,
> access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH ? 'I' : 'D');
> /* Check validity and table match */
> if (!pte_is_valid(tlb->pte0) || ((tlb->pte0 >> 6) & 1) != 0 ||
> - (tlb->pte0 & PTE_PTEM_MASK) != ctx->ptem) {
> + (tlb->pte0 & PTE_PTEM_MASK) != ptem) {
> continue;
> }
> /* all matches should have equal RPN, WIMG & PP */
> @@ -164,6 +165,10 @@ static int ppc6xx_tlb_check(CPUPPCState *env,
> }
> }
> }
> + if (ret == -1) {
> + int r = is_code ? SPR_ICMP : SPR_DCMP;
> + env->spr[r] = ptem;
> + }
> #if defined(DUMP_PAGE_TABLES)
> if (qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU)) {
> CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
> @@ -293,7 +298,7 @@ static int mmu6xx_get_physical_address(CPUPPCState *env,
> mmu_ctx_t *ctx,
> {
> PowerPCCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> hwaddr hash;
> - target_ulong vsid, sr, pgidx;
> + target_ulong vsid, sr, pgidx, ptem;
> bool pr, ds, nx;
>
> /* First try to find a BAT entry if there are any */
> @@ -320,7 +325,7 @@ static int mmu6xx_get_physical_address(CPUPPCState *env,
> mmu_ctx_t *ctx,
> access_type == MMU_DATA_STORE, type);
> pgidx = (eaddr & ~SEGMENT_MASK_256M) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
> hash = vsid ^ pgidx;
> - ctx->ptem = (vsid << 7) | (pgidx >> 10);
> + ptem = (vsid << 7) | (pgidx >> 10); /* Virtual segment ID | API */
>
> qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "pte segment: key=%d ds %d nx %d vsid "
> TARGET_FMT_lx "\n", ctx->key, ds, nx, vsid);
> @@ -339,7 +344,7 @@ static int mmu6xx_get_physical_address(CPUPPCState *env,
> mmu_ctx_t *ctx,
> /* Initialize real address with an invalid value */
> ctx->raddr = (hwaddr)-1ULL;
> /* Software TLB search */
> - return ppc6xx_tlb_check(env, ctx, eaddr, access_type, nx);
> + return ppc6xx_tlb_check(env, ctx, eaddr, access_type, ptem, nx);
> }
>
> /* Direct-store segment : absolutely *BUGGY* for now */
> @@ -741,7 +746,7 @@ static bool ppc_6xx_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
> cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_IFTLB;
> env->error_code = 1 << 18;
> env->spr[SPR_IMISS] = eaddr;
> - env->spr[SPR_ICMP] = 0x80000000 | ctx.ptem;
> + env->spr[SPR_ICMP] |= 0x80000000;
> goto tlb_miss;
> case -2:
> /* Access rights violation */
> @@ -772,7 +777,7 @@ static bool ppc_6xx_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
> env->error_code = 0;
> }
> env->spr[SPR_DMISS] = eaddr;
> - env->spr[SPR_DCMP] = 0x80000000 | ctx.ptem;
> + env->spr[SPR_DCMP] |= 0x80000000;
> tlb_miss:
> env->error_code |= ctx.key << 19;
> env->spr[SPR_HASH1] = ppc_hash32_hpt_base(cpu) +
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH 17/43] target/ppc/mmu_common.c: Remove ptem field from mmu_ctx_t,
Nicholas Piggin <=