qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] target/ppc/mem_helper.c: Remove a conditional from dcbz_comm


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/ppc/mem_helper.c: Remove a conditional from dcbz_common()
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:24:35 +0200 (CEST)

On Sun, 23 Jun 2024, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 6/22/24 13:48, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Instead of passing a bool and select a value within dcbz_common() let
the callers pass in the right value to avoid this conditional
statement. On PPC dcbz is often used to zero memory and some code uses
it a lot. This change improves the run time of a test case that copies
memory with a dcbz call in every iteration from 6.23 to 5.83 seconds.

Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
---
This is just a small optimisation removing some of the overhead but
dcbz still seems to be the biggest issue with this test. Removing the
dcbz call it runs in 2 seconds. In a profile I see:
   Children      Self  Command   Shared Object            Symbol
- 55.01% 11.44% qemu-ppc qemu-ppc [.] dcbz_common.constprop.0
                - 43.57% dcbz_common.constprop.0
                   - probe_access
                      - page_get_flags
                           interval_tree_iter_first
                - 11.44% helper_raise_exception_err
                     cpu_loop_exit_restore
                     cpu_loop
                     cpu_exec
                     cpu_exec_setjmp.isra.0
                     cpu_exec_loop.constprop.0
                     cpu_tb_exec
                     0x7f262403636e
                     helper_raise_exception_err
                     cpu_loop_exit_restore
                     cpu_loop
                     cpu_exec
                     cpu_exec_setjmp.isra.0
                     cpu_exec_loop.constprop.0
                     cpu_tb_exec
                   - 0x7f26240386a4
                        11.20% helper_dcbz
+   43.81%    12.28%  qemu-ppc  qemu-ppc                 [.] probe_access
+ 39.31% 0.00% qemu-ppc [JIT] tid 9969 [.] 0x00007f2624000000
+   32.45%     4.51%  qemu-ppc  qemu-ppc                 [.] page_get_flags
+ 25.50% 2.10% qemu-ppc qemu-ppc [.] interval_tree_iter_first + 24.67% 24.67% qemu-ppc qemu-ppc [.] interval_tree_subtree_search
+   16.75%     1.19%  qemu-ppc  qemu-ppc                 [.] helper_dcbz
+ 4.78% 4.78% qemu-ppc [JIT] tid 9969 [.] 0x00007f26240386be + 3.46% 3.46% qemu-ppc libc-2.32.so [.] __memset_avx2_unaligned_erms
Any idea how this could be optimised further? (This is running with
qemu-ppc user mode emulation but I think with system it might be even
worse.) Could an inline implementation with TCG vector ops work to
avoid the helper and let it compile to efficient host code? Even if
that could work I don't know how to do that so I'd need some further
advice on this.

  target/ppc/mem_helper.c | 7 +++----
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
index f88155ad45..361fd72226 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
+++ b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
@@ -271,12 +271,11 @@ void helper_stsw(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t nb,
  }
    static void dcbz_common(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr,
-                        uint32_t opcode, bool epid, uintptr_t retaddr)
+                        uint32_t opcode, int mmu_idx, uintptr_t retaddr)
  {
      target_ulong mask, dcbz_size = env->dcache_line_size;
      uint32_t i;
      void *haddr;
- int mmu_idx = epid ? PPC_TLB_EPID_STORE : ppc_env_mmu_index(env, false);
    #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
      /* Check for dcbz vs dcbzl on 970 */
@@ -309,12 +308,12 @@ static void dcbz_common(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr,
    void helper_dcbz(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t opcode)
  {
-    dcbz_common(env, addr, opcode, false, GETPC());
+ dcbz_common(env, addr, opcode, ppc_env_mmu_index(env, false), GETPC());

This is already computed in the translator: DisasContext.mem_idx.
If you pass the mmu_idx as an argument, you can unify these two helpers.

I've tried that. It works but slower: I get 5.9 seconds vs 5.83 with this patch so I think I'd stay with this one. Maybe it's because making the helper take 4 parameters instead of 3? I can submit the patch for reference if it would be useful but I'd keep this one for merging for now.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan


r~

  }
void helper_dcbzep(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t opcode)
  {
-    dcbz_common(env, addr, opcode, true, GETPC());
+    dcbz_common(env, addr, opcode, PPC_TLB_EPID_STORE, GETPC());
  }
    void helper_icbi(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]