qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 01/26] hw/ppc: Avoid using Monitor in pnv_phb3_msi_pic_print_


From: Harsh Prateek Bora
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] hw/ppc: Avoid using Monitor in pnv_phb3_msi_pic_print_info()
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:59:37 +0530
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird



On 6/17/24 15:49, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
Hi Phillipe,

One query below:

On 6/17/24 15:41, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:


On 6/10/24 11:50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Replace Monitor API by HumanReadableText one.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>

---
  include/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3.h |  2 +-
  hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3_msi.c     | 21 ++++++++++-----------
  hw/ppc/pnv.c                   |  8 +++++++-
  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)


<snip>

diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
index 6e3a5ccdec..5356a4e295 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
  #include "hw/loader.h"
  #include "hw/nmi.h"
  #include "qapi/visitor.h"
+#include "qapi/type-helpers.h"
  #include "monitor/monitor.h"
  #include "hw/intc/intc.h"
  #include "hw/ipmi/ipmi.h"
@@ -774,8 +775,13 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_pic_print_info(PnvChip *chip, Monitor *mon)
      for (i = 0; i < chip8->num_phbs; i++) {
          PnvPHB *phb = chip8->phbs[i];
          PnvPHB3 *phb3 = PNV_PHB3(phb->backend);
+        g_autoptr(GString) buf = g_string_new("");
+        g_autoptr(HumanReadableText) info = NULL;
+
+        pnv_phb3_msi_pic_print_info(&phb3->msis, buf);
+        info = human_readable_text_from_str(buf);
+        monitor_puts(mon, info->human_readable_text);
-        pnv_phb3_msi_pic_print_info(&phb3->msis, mon);
          ics_pic_print_info(&phb3->lsis, mon);

How is the memory allocated to info in human_readable_text_from_str being reclaimed here? Isnt it a mem leak ?

Ok, I see, g_autoptr takes care of auto cleanup. Please ignore.

Thanks
Harsh

      }
  }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]