qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ppc/pnv: Begin a more complete ADU LPC model for POWER9/


From: Nicholas Piggin
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ppc/pnv: Begin a more complete ADU LPC model for POWER9/10
Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 22:39:59 +1000

On Wed Apr 17, 2024 at 9:25 PM AEST, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Hello Nick,
>
> On 4/17/24 13:02, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > This implements a framework for an ADU unit model.
> > 
> > The ADU unit actually implements XSCOM, which is the bridge between MMIO
> > and PIB. However it also includes control and status registers and other
> > functions that are exposed as PIB (xscom) registers.
> > 
> > To keep things simple, pnv_xscom.c remains the XSCOM bridge
> > implementation, and pnv_adu.c implements the ADU registers and other
> > functions.
> > 
> > So far, just the ADU no-op registers in the pnv_xscom.c default handler
> > are moved over to the adu model.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   include/hw/ppc/pnv_adu.h   |  34 ++++++++++++
> >   include/hw/ppc/pnv_chip.h  |   3 +
> >   include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h |   6 ++
> >   hw/ppc/pnv.c               |  16 ++++++
> >   hw/ppc/pnv_adu.c           | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c         |   9 ---
> >   hw/ppc/meson.build         |   1 +
> >   hw/ppc/trace-events        |   4 ++
> >   8 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 include/hw/ppc/pnv_adu.h
> >   create mode 100644 hw/ppc/pnv_adu.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_adu.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_adu.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..9dc91857a9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_adu.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> > +/*
> > + * QEMU PowerPC PowerNV Emulation of some ADU behaviour
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2024, IBM Corporation.
> > + *
> > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later
>
>
> Did you mean GPL-2.0-or-later ?

Hey Cedric,

Thanks for reviewing, I've been away so sorry for the late reply.

It just came from one of the headers I copied which was LGPL. But
there's really nothing much in it and could find a GPL header to
copy. Is GPL-2.0-or-later preferred?

Thanks,
Nick



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]